Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2020 May 22;295(21):7211-7212.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.H120.013868.

How a tailor achieves the perfect fit

Affiliations
Comment

How a tailor achieves the perfect fit

Jeff D Colbert et al. J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

Most antigenic peptides that bind stably to a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) I molecule for display to the immune system are approximately the same length, thanks in part to the expert trimming done by endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidases (ERAPs), the final peptidases in the antigen-presentation pathway. An open question is whether ERAPs edit peptides to this optimal length while they are bound to MHC I molecules (using the latter as a pattern of sorts) or by free hand. Mavridis et al. present multiple lines of evidence that this trimming cannot readily occur on MHC I molecules, but rather only in solution, suggesting that ERAPs work alone to tailor the perfect fit for the immunopeptidome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Models for ERAP generation of MHC I–presented peptides. Top, ERAP1 trimming of long peptides to mature (optimal) size in solution, followed by peptide binding to MHC I molecules. Bottom, using MHC I molecules as a size template for ERAP to trim MHC I–bound long peptides to mature size. The dashed arrows indicate that this pathway is unlikely, based on results from Mavridis et al. (8).

Comment on

References

    1. Rock K. L., Reits E., and Neefjes J.. 2016) Present yourself! By MHC class I and MHC class II molecules. Trends Immunol. 37, 724–737 10.1016/j.it.2016.08.010 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Falk K., Rötzschke O., and Rammensee H.-G.. 1990) Cellular peptide composition governed by major histocompatibility complex class I molecules. Nature 348, 248–251 10.1038/348248a0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Evnouchidou I., and van Endert P.. 2019) Peptide trimming by endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidases: role of MHC class I binding and ERAP dimerization. Hum. Immunol. 80, 290–295 10.1016/j.humimm.2019.01.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mpakali A., Maben Z., Stern L. J., and Stratikos E.. 2019) Molecular pathways for antigenic peptide generation by ER aminopeptidase 1. Mol. Immunol. 113, 50–57 10.1016/j.molimm.2018.03.026 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stratikos E., and Stern L. J.. 2013) Antigenic peptide trimming by ER aminopeptidases—insights from structural studies. Mol. Immunol. 55, 212–219 10.1016/j.molimm.2013.03.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types