Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 21;10(5):e036338.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036338.

Early evaluation of the 'STOP SEPSIS!' WHO Global Maternal Sepsis Awareness Campaign implemented for healthcare providers in 46 low, middle and high-income countries

Collaborators, Affiliations

Early evaluation of the 'STOP SEPSIS!' WHO Global Maternal Sepsis Awareness Campaign implemented for healthcare providers in 46 low, middle and high-income countries

Vanessa Brizuela et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate changes in awareness of maternal sepsis among healthcare providers resulting from the WHO Global Maternal Sepsis Study (GLOSS) awareness campaign.

Design: Independent sample precampaign/postcampaign through online and paper-based surveys available for over 30 days before campaign roll-out (pre) and after study data collection (post). Descriptive statistics were used for campaign recognition and exposure, and odds ratio (OR) and percentage change were calculated for differences in awareness, adjusting for confounders using multivariate logistic regression.

Setting and participants: Healthcare providers from 398 participating facilities in 46 low, middle and high-income countries.

Intervention: An awareness campaign to accompany GLOSS launched 3 weeks prior to data collection and lasting the entire study period (28 November 2017 to 15 January 2018) and beyond.

Main outcome measures: Campaign recognition and exposure, and changes in awareness.

Results: A total of 2188 surveys were analysed: 1155 at baseline and 1033 at postcampaign. Most survey respondents found the campaign materials helpful (94%), that they helped increase awareness (90%) and that they helped motivate to act differently (88%). There were significant changes with regard to: not having heard of maternal sepsis (-63.4% change, pre-OR/post-OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.68) and perception of confidence in making the right decisions with regard to maternal sepsis identification and management (7.3% change, pre-OR/post-OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.06).

Conclusions: Awareness raising campaigns can contribute to an increase in having heard of maternal sepsis and an increase in provider perception of confidence in making correct decisions. Offering the information to make accurate and timely decisions while promoting environments that enable self-confidence and support could improve maternal sepsis identification and management.

Keywords: maternal medicine; perinatology; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors declare support from WHO/SHR, Merck for Mothers and USAID for the submitted work. VB, MB and JPS were employed by WHO at the time of the study. No other relationships or activities could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Countries eligible for the Global Maternal Sepsis Study (GLOSS) ‘STOP SEPSIS!’ awareness campaign evaluation (n=46). Color key: teal: countries included in the GLOSS STOP SEPSIS! awareness campaign evaluation (N=37); green: countries eligible for the evaluation but excluded from this analysis because less than 2 responses received (N=9)The boundaries shown on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WHO concerning the legal status of any country, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries
Figure 2
Figure 2
Measures of campaign exposure in percentages (n=1033).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Responses when answering Yes to the question ‘Did the information provided in the materials motivate you to do something differently than before?’ (n=658).(Respondents were able to check as many response options as needed.)

References

    1. Reinhart K, Daniels R, Kissoon N, et al. . Recognizing sepsis as a global health priority — a WHO resolution. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2017;377:414–7. 10.1056/NEJMp1707170 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rudd KE, Kissoon N, Limmathurotsakul D, et al. . The global burden of sepsis: barriers and potential solutions. Crit Care 2018;22:232. 10.1186/s13054-018-2157-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jawad I, Lukšić I, Rafnsson SB. Assessing available information on the burden of sepsis: global estimates of incidence, prevalence and mortality. J Glob Health 2012;2 10.7189/jogh.01.010404 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization Improving the prevention, diagnosis and management of sepsis. World Health Assembly, 2017. Available: http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA70/A70_R7-en.pdf?ua=1
    1. Surviving sepsis campaign | history. Available: http://www.survivingsepsis.org/About-SSC/Pages/History.aspx [Accessed 20 Aug 2017].

Publication types