Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020;10(3):1087-1098.
doi: 10.3233/JPD-202078.

Recommendations for the Organization of Multidisciplinary Clinical Care Teams in Parkinson's Disease

Affiliations

Recommendations for the Organization of Multidisciplinary Clinical Care Teams in Parkinson's Disease

Danique L M Radder et al. J Parkinsons Dis. 2020.

Abstract

Background: Optimal management in expert centers for Parkinson's disease (PD) usually involves pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, delivered by a multidisciplinary approach. However, there is no guideline specifying how this model should be organized. Consequently, the nature of multidisciplinary care varies widely.

Objective: To optimize care delivery, we aimed to provide recommendations for the organization of multidisciplinary care in PD.

Methods: Twenty expert centers in the field of multidisciplinary PD care participated. Their leading neurologists completed a survey covering eight themes: elements for optimal multidisciplinary care; team members; role of patients and care partners; team coordination; team meetings; inpatient versus outpatient care; telehealth; and challenges towards multidisciplinary care. During a consensus meeting, outcomes were incorporated into concept recommendations that were reviewed by each center's multidisciplinary team. Three patient organizations rated the recommendations according to patient priorities. Based on this feedback, a final set of recommendations (essential elements for delivery of multidisciplinary care) and considerations (desirable elements) was developed.

Results: We developed 30 recommendations and 10 considerations. The patient organizations rated the following recommendations as most important: care is organized in a patient-centered way; every newly diagnosed patient has access to a core multidisciplinary team; and each team has a coordinator. A checklist was created to further facilitate its implementation.

Conclusion: We provide a practical tool to improve multidisciplinary care for persons with PD at the organizational level. Future studies should focus on implementing these recommendations in clinical practice, evaluating their potential applicability and effectiveness, and comparing alternative models of PD care.

Keywords: Parkinson’s disease; guideline; interdisciplinary; multidisciplinary; organization of care; practice-based evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Box 1
Box 1
: Definitions used in this project.
Fig.1
Fig.1
Development of the practice-based guideline.

References

    1. Den Oudsten BL, Van Heck GL, De Vries J (2007) Quality of life and related concepts in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. Mov Disord 2, 1528–1537. - PubMed
    1. Lees AJ, Hardy J, Revesz T (2009) Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 373, 2055–2066. - PubMed
    1. LeWitt PA, Fahn S (2016) Levodopa therapy for Parkinson disease: A look backward and forward. Neurology 86(14 Suppl 1), S3–12. - PubMed
    1. Pfeiffer RF (2016) Non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 22(Suppl 1), S119–122. - PubMed
    1. Tomlinson CL, Patel S, Meek C, Clarke CE, Stowe R, Shah L, Sackley CM, Deane KH, Herd CP, Wheatley K, Ives N (2012) Physiotherapy versus placebo or no intervention in Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7, CD002817. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms