Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Sep;24(8):1505-1516.
doi: 10.1002/ejp.1605. Epub 2020 Jun 12.

The pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of a novel selective-dose cannabis inhaler in patients with chronic pain: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of a novel selective-dose cannabis inhaler in patients with chronic pain: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial

Shlomo Almog et al. Eur J Pain. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Precise cannabis treatment dosing remains a major challenge, leading to physicians' reluctance to prescribe medical cannabis.

Objective: To test the pharmacokinetics, analgesic effect, cognitive performance and safety effects of an innovative medical device that enables the delivery of inhaled therapeutic doses of Δ9 -Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in patients with chronic pain.

Methods: In a randomized, three-arms, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial, 27 patients received a single inhalation of Δ9 -THC: 0.5mg, 1mg, or a placebo. Δ9 -THC plasma levels were measured at baseline and up to 150-min post-inhalation. Pain intensity and safety parameters were recorded on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) at pre-defined time points. The cognitive performance was evaluated using the selective sub-tests of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB).

Results: Following inhalation of 0.5 mg or 1mg, Δ9 -THC plasma Cmax ± SD were 14.3 ± 7.7 and 33.8 ± 25.7 ng/ml. Tmax ± SD were 3.7 ± 1.4 and 4.4 ± 2.1 min, and AUC0infinity ±SD were 300 ± 144 and 769 ± 331 ng*min/ml, respectively. Both doses, but not the placebo, demonstrated a significant reduction in pain intensity compared with baseline and remained stable for 150-min. The 1-mg dose showed a significant pain decrease compared to the placebo. Adverse events were mostly mild and resolved spontaneously. There was no evidence of consistent impairments in cognitive performance.

Conclusion: This feasibility trial demonstrated that a metered-dose cannabis inhaler delivered precise and low THC doses, produced a dose-dependent and safe analgesic effect in patients with neuropathic pain/ complex-regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Thus, it enables individualization of medical cannabis regimens that can be evaluated pharmacokinetically and pharmacodynamically by accepted pharmaceutical models.

Significance: Evidence suggests that cannabis-based medicines are an effective treatment for chronic pain in adults. The pharmacokinetics of THC varies as a function of its route of administration. Pulmonary assimilation of inhaled THC causes rapid onset of analgesia. However, currently used routes of cannabinoids delivery provide unknown doses, making it impossible to implement a pharmaceutical standard treatment plan. A novel selective-dose cannabis inhaler delivers significantly low and precise doses of THC, thus allowing the administration of inhaled cannabis-based medicines according to high pharmaceutical standards. These low doses of THC can produce safe and effective analgesia in patients with chronic pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Almog is a consultant for Syqe Medical; Prof. Aharon‐Peretz reports no disclosures; Dr. Hayon, Mrs. Ogintz, Mrs. Abalia, and Mr. Lupo are employees of Syqe Medical; Dr. Vulfsons and Prof. Eisenberg received research support from Syqe Medical.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study design (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials [CONSORT]) flow diagram. ITT = intent to treat
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Δ9‐THC plasma levels following a single inhalation of 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg THC doses. Data are presented as means and standard deviations
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Change in Visual Analogue Score (VAS) pain score from baseline in the three study doses—placebo (0 mg), 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg THC
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Observed profile of selected subjective adverse effects by inhaling 0, 0.5 and 1.0 mg THC. Adverse events were proactively evaluated and scored on a Visual Analogue Score (VAS) scale of 0–10

References

    1. Abrams, D. I. , Couey, P. , Shade, S. B. , Kelly, M. E. , & Benowitz, N. L. (2011). Cannabinoid‐opioid interaction in chronic pain. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 90(6), 844–851. 10.1038/clpt.2011.188 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abrams, D. I. , Vizoso, H. P. , Shade, S. B. , Jay, C. , Kelly, M. E. , & Benowitz, N. L. (2007). Vaporization as a smokeless cannabis delivery system: A pilot study. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 82, 572–578. - PubMed
    1. Andreae, M. H. , Carter, G. M. , Shaparin, N. , Suslov, K. , Ellis, R. J. , Ware, M. A. , … Sacks, H. S. (2015). Inhaled cannabis for chronic neuropathic pain: A meta‐analysis of individual patient data. The Journal of Pain, 16, 1221–1232. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atwal, N. , Casey, S. L. , Mitchell, V. A. , & Vaughan, C. W. (2019). THC and gabapentin interactions in a mouse neuropathic pain model. Neuropharmacology, 144, 115–121. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.10.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Campbell, G. , Stockings, E. , & Nielsen, S. (2019). Understanding the evidence for medical cannabis and cannabis‐based medicines for the treatment of chronic non‐cancer pain. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 269(1), 135–144. 10.1007/s00406-018-0960-9 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types