Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Aug:116:104749.
doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2020.104749. Epub 2020 May 11.

Influence of Demographic Factors on the Prevalence of a Second Root Canal in Mandibular Anterior Teeth - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional Studies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Influence of Demographic Factors on the Prevalence of a Second Root Canal in Mandibular Anterior Teeth - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional Studies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Jorge N R Martins et al. Arch Oral Biol. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the influence of population demographic characteristics on the prevalence of a second canal in mandibular anterior teeth.

Design: Four electronic databases and five peer-reviewed journals were searched from May 2018 to September 2019 for prevalence studies using cone-beam computed tomographic imaging on second canal morphology in mandibular anterior teeth. The identified studies were subjected to a hand search of bibliographic references followed by contact with the authors. Full text analysis and critical appraisal (JBI) was undertaken on 40 papers by 2 evaluators. Sixteen studies were included into a meta-analysis. Forest plots with proportion and odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval were calculated. Meta-regression was performed in order to identify possible sources of heterogeneity.

Results: The 16 selected studies presented an average JBI score of 77.7% and revealed data from 40,784 mandibular anterior teeth (14,278 central incisors, 14,433 lateral incisors, and 12,073 canines). The overall prevalence of a second canal for central incisors, lateral incisors and canines was 20.4% (15.0%-25.7% CI 95%), 25.3% (20.0%-30.7% CI 95%) and 5.9% (4.1%-7.7% CI 95%), respectively. Males showed significantly higher odds of having a second canal for both incisors (p < 0.05). East Asia studies presented lower proportions of a second canal in mandibular anterior teeth (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The overall prevalence of a second canal in the mandibular central and lateral incisors and canines was 20.4%, 25.3% and 5.9%, respectively. Meta-analysis calculation revealed gender and patient geographic origin as possible confounding factors of the proportion outcomes.

Keywords: Anatomy; canine; cone-beam computed tomography; incisor; mandibular teeth; review; systematic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

LinkOut - more resources