Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul:81:102768.
doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102768. Epub 2020 May 20.

A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of Medications for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder within the Criminal Justice System

Christine E Grella  1 , Erika Ostile  2 , Christy K Scott  3 , Michael Dennis  4 , John Carnavale  5
Affiliations

A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of Medications for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder within the Criminal Justice System

Christine E Grella et al. Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Policies aimed at addressing the high rates of opioid overdose have prioritized increasing access to medications for treatment of opioid use disorder (MOUD). Numerous barriers exist to providing MOUD within the criminal justice system and/or to justice-involved populations. The aim of this study was to conduct a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature on implementation of MOUD within criminal justice settings and with justice-involved populations.

Methods: A systematic search process identified 53 papers that addressed issues pertaining to implementation barriers or facilitators of MOUD within correctional settings or with justice-involved populations; these were coded and qualitatively analyzed for common themes.

Results: Over half of the papers were published outside of the U.S. (n = 28); the most common study designs were surveys or structured interviews (n = 20) and qualitative interviews/focus groups (n = 18) conducted with correctional or treatment staff and with incarcerated individuals. Four categories of barriers and facilitators were identified: institutional, programmatic, attitudinal, and systemic. Institutional barriers typically limited capacity to provide MOUD to justice-involved individuals, which led to programmatic practices in which MOUD was not implemented following clinical guidelines, often resulting in forcible withdrawal or inadequate treatment. These programmatic practices commonly led to aversive experiences among justice-involved individuals, who consequently espoused negative attitudes about MOUD and were reluctant to seek treatment with MOUD following their release to the community. Facilitators of MOUD implementation included increased knowledge and information from training interventions and favorable prior experiences with individuals being treated with MOUD among correctional and treatment staff. Few systemic facilitators to implementing MOUD with justice-involved individuals were evident in the literature.

Conclusion: Barriers to implementing MOUD in criminal justice settings and/or with justice-involved populations are pervasive, multi-leveled, and inter-dependent. More work is needed on facilitators of MOUD implementation.

Keywords: barriers; criminal justice system; facilitators; implementation; medication; opioid use disorder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Systematic Review Flow Chart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Albizu-Garcia C, Caraballo JN, Caraballo G, & Hernández-Viver A. (2012). Assessing need for medication-assisted treatment for opiate-dependent prison inmates. Substance Abuse, 33(1), 60–69. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Society of Addiction Medicine. (2020). ASAM National Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder. Rockville, MD: Author.
    1. Andrews CM, D’Aunno TA, Pollack HA, & Friedmann P. (2014). Adoption of evidence-based clinical innovations: The case of buprenorphine use by opioid treatment programs, Medical Care Research and Review, 71(1), 43–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arksey H. & O’Malley L. (2005) Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8 (1), 19–32.
    1. Aronowitz SV, & Laurent J. (2016). Screaming behind a door: The experiences of individuals incarcerated without medication-assisted treatment. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 22(2), 98–108. doi:10.1177/1078345816634079 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms