Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Jul:36:29-37.
doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 May 21.

A role for the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in enhancing regulation of both craving and negative emotions in internet gaming disorder: A randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A role for the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in enhancing regulation of both craving and negative emotions in internet gaming disorder: A randomized trial

Lu-Lu Wu et al. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Reward-seeking and relief from negative emotions are two central motivational drives underlying addictions. Impaired executive control over craving and negative emotions contributes to compulsive addictive behaviors. Neuroimaging evidence has implicated the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in regulating craving or emotions. This study aims at examining whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over a specific region of the PFC would enhance both regulation processes. Thirty-three men with internet gaming disorder received active (1.5 mA for 20 minutes) and sham tDCS over the right dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC) one week apart in a randomized order. During each stimulation session, participants regulated craving for gaming during a regulation of craving (ROC) task and negative emotions during an emotion regulation (ER) task using cognitive reappraisal. Subjective ratings of craving and negative emotions and skin conductance responses (SCRs) were recorded. For both craving and negative emotions, tDCS of the right dlPFC facilitated downregulation and upregulation: active relative to sham tDCS decreased ratings (ROC: 95% CI of difference -1.38 to -0.56, p < 0.001; ER: -1.65 to -0.70, p < 0.001) and/or SCRs (ROC: -1.99 to -0.41 μs, p = 0.004) for downregulation, and increased ratings (ROC: 0.24 to 0.82, p = 0.001; ER: 0.26 to 0.72, p < 0.001) for upregulation. These findings provide the first experimental evidence confirming that tDCS of the right dlPFC enhances both craving- and negative-emotion-regulation. This suggests a promising approach for concurrently enhancing executive control over two central motivational drives underlying addictions.

Keywords: Craving regulation; Internet gaming disorder; Negative emotion regulation; Transcranial direct current stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Structure for the ROC and ER blocks. Each block began with a down- or upregulation cue which was followed by four pictures (gaming pictures in the ROC task or negative pictures in the ER task). Participants were instructed to view and reappraise pictures in accordance with the regulation condition of the current block. After each picture, participants rated how much they craved playing internet games in the ROC blocks and rated how negative they felt in the ER blocks.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
tDCS effects on regulation of craving and negative emotions. (A) For downregulation, decreased craving was observed during active vs. sham stimulation; for upregulation, increased craving was observed during active vs. sham stimulation. (B) For downregulation, decreased SCRs were observed during active vs. sham stimulation during performance of the ROC task. (C) For downregulation, decreased negative emotional responses were observed during active vs. sham stimulation; for upregulation, increased negative emotional responses were observed during active vs. sham stimulation. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001; n.s, not significant)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albein-Urios N, Verdejo-Roman J, Asensio S, Soriano-Mas C, Martinez-Gonzalez JM, Verdejo-Garcia A, 2014. Re-appraisal of negative emotions in cocaine dependence: dysfunctional corticolimbic activation and connectivity. Addict Biol. 19, 415–426. - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association, 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
    1. Azizi A, Borjali A, Golzari M, 2010. The effectiveness of emotion regulation training and cognitive therapy on the emotional and addictional problems of substance abusers. Iran J Psychiatry. 5, 60–65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker TB, Piper ME, McCarthy DE, Majeskie MR, Fiore MC, 2004. Addiction motivation reformulated: an affective processing model of negative reinforcement. Psychol Rev. 111, 33–51. - PubMed
    1. Boggio PS, Sultani N, Fecteau S, Merabet L, Mecca T, Pascual-Leone A, Basaglia A, Fregni F, 2008. Prefrontal cortex modulation using transcranial DC stimulation reduces alcohol craving: A double-blind, sham-controlled study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 92, 55–60. - PubMed

Publication types