Associations of workflow disruptions in the operating room with surgical outcomes: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
- PMID: 32447319
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010639
Associations of workflow disruptions in the operating room with surgical outcomes: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
Abstract
Background: Performance in the operating room is an important determinant of surgical safety. Flow disruptions (FDs) represent system-related performance problems that affect the efficiency of the surgical team and have been associated with a risk to patient safety. Despite the growing evidence base on FDs, a systematic synthesis has not yet been published.
Objective: Our aim was to identify, evaluate and summarise the evidence on relationships between intraoperative FD events and provider, surgical process and patient outcomes.
Methods: We systematically searched databases MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO (last update: September 2019). Two reviewers independently screened the resulting studies at the title/abstract and full text stage in duplicate, and all inconsistencies were resolved through discussion. We assessed the risk of bias of included studies using established and validated tools. We summarised effects from included studies through a narrative synthesis, stratified based on predefined surgical outcome categories, including surgical process, provider and patient outcomes.
Results: We screened a total of 20 481 studies. 38 studies were found to be eligible. Included studies were highly heterogeneous in terms of methodology, medical specialty and context. Across studies, 20.5% of operating time was attributed to FDs. Various other process, patient and provider outcomes were reported. Most studies reported negative or non-significant associations of FDs with surgical outcomes.
Conclusion: Apart from the identified relationship of FDs with procedure duration, the evidence base concerning the impact of FDs on provider, surgical process and patient outcomes is limited and heterogeneous. We further provide recommendations concerning use of methods, relevant outcomes and avenues for future research on associated effects of FDs in surgery.
Keywords: interruptions; patient safety; surgery; teamwork.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Intraoperative dynamics of workflow disruptions and surgeons' technical performance failures: insights from a simulated operating room.Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4452-4461. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08797-0. Epub 2021 Nov 1. Surg Endosc. 2022. PMID: 34724585 Free PMC article.
-
Minor flow disruptions, traffic-related factors and their effect on major flow disruptions in the operating room.BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Apr;28(4):276-283. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007957. Epub 2018 Aug 29. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019. PMID: 30158119 Free PMC article.
-
Are operating room distractions, interruptions and disruptions associated with performance and patient safety? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Apr 28;33(2):mzab068. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab068. Int J Qual Health Care. 2021. PMID: 33856028
-
Operating room team strategies to reduce flow disruptions in high-risk task episodes: resilience in robot-assisted surgery.Ergonomics. 2023 Aug;66(8):1118-1131. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2136406. Epub 2022 Oct 26. Ergonomics. 2023. PMID: 36285451
-
Workflow disruptions in robot-assisted surgery.J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2663-2669. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01728-2. Epub 2023 Oct 10. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 37815757 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Operating room organization and surgical performance: a systematic review.Patient Saf Surg. 2024 Jan 29;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13037-023-00388-3. Patient Saf Surg. 2024. PMID: 38287316 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Addressing misconceptions of flow disruption studies in "Is non-stop always better? Examining assumptions behind the concept of flow disruptions in studies of robot-assisted surgery".J Robot Surg. 2022 Aug;16(4):989-990. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01318-0. Epub 2021 Oct 9. J Robot Surg. 2022. PMID: 34626319 Free PMC article.
-
Intraoperative dynamics of workflow disruptions and surgeons' technical performance failures: insights from a simulated operating room.Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4452-4461. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08797-0. Epub 2021 Nov 1. Surg Endosc. 2022. PMID: 34724585 Free PMC article.
-
Unpacking the Broad Landscape of Intraoperative Stressors for Clinical Personnel: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Jul 17;16:1953-1977. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S401325. eCollection 2023. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023. PMID: 37484819 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Associations of flow disruptions with patient, staff, and process outcomes: a prospective observational study of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies.Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):6964-6974. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10162-2. Epub 2023 Jun 19. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 37336845 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources