Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 24;15(1):121.
doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01572-w.

Stability and reproducibility of 6013 deep inspiration breath-holds in left-sided breast cancer

Affiliations

Stability and reproducibility of 6013 deep inspiration breath-holds in left-sided breast cancer

D Reitz et al. Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with left-sided breast cancer frequently receive deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy to reduce the risk of cardiac side effects. The aim of the present study was to analyze intra-breath-hold stability and inter-fraction breath-hold reproducibility in clinical practice.

Material and methods: Overall, we analyzed 103 patients receiving left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy using a surface-guided DIBH technique. During each treatment session the vertical motion of the patient was continuously measured by a surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) system and automated gating control (beam on/off) was performed using an audio-visual patient feedback system. Dose delivery was automatically triggered when the tracking point was within a predefined gating window. Intra-breath-hold stability and inter-fraction reproducibility across all fractions of the entire treatment course were analyzed per patient.

Results: In the present series, 6013 breath-holds during beam-on time were analyzed. The mean amplitude of the gating window from the baseline breathing curve (maximum expiration during free breathing) was 15.8 mm (95%-confidence interval: [8.5-30.6] mm) and had a width of 3.5 mm (95%-CI: [2-4.3] mm). As a measure of intra-breath-hold stability, the median standard deviation of the breath-hold level during DIBH was 0.3 mm (95%-CI: [0.1-0.9] mm). Similarly, the median absolute intra-breath-hold linear amplitude deviation was 0.4 mm (95%-CI: [0.01-2.1] mm). Reproducibility testing showed good inter-fractional reliability, as the maximum difference in the breathing amplitudes in all patients and all fractions were 1.3 mm on average (95%-CI: [0.5-2.6] mm).

Conclusion: The clinical integration of an optical surface scanner enables a stable and reliable DIBH treatment delivery during SGRT for left-sided breast cancer in clinical routine.

Keywords: Breast cancer; DIBH; Inter-fraction; Intra-breath-hold; Optical surface scanner; Reproducibility; Stability; Surface guided radiation therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CB, PF received research grants and MR, SC, PF speaker honoraria from C-RAD. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Graphical demonstration of the c4D-Tool; the red point on the patients surface is the reference point for tracking the vertical amplitude during breath-hold; the lower part of the screenshot shows an amplitude over time-plot
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Time plot showing the vertical breathing curve amplitude over time; dashed red lines are showing the lower and upper limit of the gating window
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
One deep inspiration breath-hold cycle plot showing the vertical deviation in millimeters over time (blue); the green line is a linear fit plot of the blue signal (example of the linear function by linear fit: y = 0.0165•time+ 17.69); dashed red lines are showing the lower and upper limit of the gating window
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a Box plots of breathing amplitudes during breath-hold for every patient including all breath-holds sorted by the median value, b histogram of the breathing amplitudes (n = 103 patients, 6013 breath-holds)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
a Box plots of standard deviation of the breath-hold levels for every patient. b histogram of the standard deviations. c Box plots of the linear fit amplitude in millimeters inside the gating window during breath-hold for every patient based on linear fit model. d histogram of the linear fit amplitudes (n = 103 patients, 6013 breath-holds)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Corradini S, Alongi F, Andratschke N, et al. MR-guidance in clinical reality: current treatment challenges and future perspectives. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1308-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pazos M, Schönecker S, Reitz D, et al. Recent developments in radiation oncology: an overview of individualised treatment strategies in breast Cancer. Breast Care (Basel) 2018;13(4):285–291. doi: 10.1159/000488189. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hayden AJ, Rains M, Tiver K. Deep inspiration breath-hold technique reduces heart dose from radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2012;56(4):464–472. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02405.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schönecker S, Walter F, Freislederer P, et al. Treatment planning and evaluation of gated radiotherapy in left-sided breast cancer patients using the catalyst(TM)/sentinel(TM) system for deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) Radiat Oncol. 2016;11(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0716-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergom C, Currey A, Desai N, et al. Deep inspiration breath-hold: techniques and advantages for cardiac sparing during breast Cancer irradiation. Front Oncol. 2018;8:87. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00087. - DOI - PMC - PubMed