Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Jul;35(7):673-683.
doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00650-3. Epub 2020 May 24.

Global, regional and time-trend prevalence of central obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13.2 million subjects

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Global, regional and time-trend prevalence of central obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13.2 million subjects

Martin C S Wong et al. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

We aimed to examine the global prevalences of central obesity according to age, sex, race, place of residence, geographical region, national income level, and the definitions of central obesity. MEDLINE and Embase were searched. Studies with sample size of ≥ 500 and investigated individuals aged ≥ 15 years were included. Metaprop (a Stata command) was adopted to conduct a meta-analysis of prevalence, and the Freeman-Tukey Double Arcsine Transformation was used to stabilize the variances. A random-effects model was used to evaluate the prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of central obesity. There were 288 studies involving 13,233,675 individuals in this analysis. The overall prevalence of central obesity was 41.5% (95% CI 39.9-43.2%). A higher prevalence was found in older individuals, female subjects, urban residents, Caucasians, and populations of higher income level countries. Regarding regional variations, the highest prevalence was found in Sothern America (55.1%, 95% CI 45.8-64.3%) and Central American (52.9%, 95% CI 32.7-72.7%). Its prevalence was rapidly rising from 1985 to 2014. From 1985-1999 to 2010-2014, younger subjects aged 15-40 years showed a more drastic rise in prevalence (16.3 to 33.9%) than subjects aged > 40 years (43.6 to 57.9%). Male individuals have a more drastic rise (25.3 to 41.6%) than females (38.6 to 49.7%). Major increasing in prevalence of the condition in the past three decades, particularly in certain subgroups. These findings could act as a useful reference to inform public health strategies to minimize the impact of central obesity on population health.

Keywords: Central obesity; Epidemiology; Prevalence; Temporal trend; Waist circumference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Selection of articles for systematic review
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Prevalence of central obesity by age, sex, place, criteria, and race
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Prevalence of central obesity by region and income level
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Time trend prevalence of central obesity by sex and age
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Global prevalence of central obesity by country

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO. Waist Circumference and Waist–Hip Ratio: Report of a WHO Expert Consultation 8–11 December ed. Geneva; 2008. p. 47.
    1. Carey DGP. Abdominal obesity. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1998;9(1):35–40. - PubMed
    1. Hojgaard B, Olsen KR, Sogaard J, Sorensen TIA, Gyrd-Hansen D. Economic costs of abdominal obesity. Obes Facts. 2008;1(3):146–154. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cornier MA, Tate CW, Grunwald GK, Bessesen DH. Relationship between waist circumference, body mass index, and medical care costs. Obes Res. 2002;10(11):1167–1172. - PubMed
    1. APCSC Central obesity and risk of cardiovascular disease in the Asia Pacific Region. Asia Pac J Clin Nutri. 2006;15(3):287–92. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources