Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;73(1):165-171.
doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00810-w. Epub 2020 May 24.

Post surgical rectovaginal fistula: who really benefits from stoma diversion?

Affiliations

Post surgical rectovaginal fistula: who really benefits from stoma diversion?

Giuliano Barugola et al. Updates Surg. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

To analyze the role of stoma diversion and timing of stoma maintenance in the healing of post-surgical Recto Vaginal Fistulae (psRVF). A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained registry. All patients with a psRVF diagnosed at IRCCS Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital of Negrar di Valpolicella from January 2002 to December 2016 were analyzed. The baseline treatment was a fecal diversion. Patients were divided into two groups according to healing time: < 6 months (Group 1) or > 6 months (Group 2). 2043 women underwent rectal resections in the study period. We recorded 37 patients with psRVF (1.8%). Nineteen women (51.3%) healed (Group 1) within 6 months. The median time of psRVF recovery in group 1 was 99.7 days. Concomitant local treatment of the fistula did not influence the healing rate (p 0.8). Colostomies were significantly higher in group 1 (p 0.003). The size of the psRVF influenced the success rate of fistula healing with loop stoma (p 0.07). A multivariate analysis the presence of fever and pelvic abscess (pelvis sepsis) were significantly associated with diversion failure (p 0.035). A step-up approach with the maintenance of loop stoma at least for six months for all patients with psRVF could be changed. Patients with larger fistula and pelvic sepsis at index procedure should be addressed earlier to a specific second-level treatment.

Keywords: Anastomotic leak; Endometriosis; Recto-vaginal fistula; Stoma diversion.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

Reference

    1. Pinto RA, Peterson TV, Shawki S, Davila GW, Wexner SD (2010) Are there predictors of outcome following rectovaginal fistula repair? Dis Colon Rectum 53:1240–1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181e536cb - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kosugi C, Saito N, Kimata Y, Ono M, Sugito M, Ito M, Sato K, Koda K, Miyazaki M (2005) Rectovaginal fistulas after rectal cancer surgery: incidence and operative repair by gluteal-fold flap repair. Surgery 137:329–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2004.10.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Matthiessen P, Hansson L, Sjödahl R, Rutegård J (2010) Anastomotic-vaginal fistula (AVF) after anterior resection of the rectum for cancer–occurrence and risk factors. Colorectal Dis. 12:351–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01798.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ulrich U, Buchweitz O, Greb R, Keckstein J, von Leffern I, Oppelt P et al (2013) Interdisciplinary S2k guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis: short version—AWMF registry no. 015–045, August 2013. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 73:890–898. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1350810 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Belghiti J, Ballester M, Zilberman S, Thomin A, Zacharopoulou C, Bazot M et al (2014) Role of protective defunctioning stoma in colorectal resection for endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:472–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.094 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources