The process of curricular integration and its effects on anatomical knowledge retention
- PMID: 32449191
- DOI: 10.1002/ca.23632
The process of curricular integration and its effects on anatomical knowledge retention
Abstract
Introduction: Integration has been recognized as an important aspect of medical education. After transitioning from a discipline-specific to a systems-based preclinical curriculum, we examined faculty perceptions of the integrated approach and also whether it would lead to better anatomy knowledge retention.
Methods: To understand faculty perspectives, we reviewed curricular materials, interviewed block directors, and observed educational sessions. We analyzed knowledge retention through a 27-question anatomy test, comparing scores from the last class of the discipline-based curriculum and the first two classes of the integrated curriculum.
Results: Planning integrated content involves purposeful ordering, is challenging for faculty, and requires additional resources. Evaluation of the integrated approach for anatomy content demonstrated a significant increase in knowledge retention (p = .012; 56.28% vs. 63.98% for old vs. new curriculum).
Conclusions: This study helps the understanding of what is required for curricular integration. Our anatomy evaluation results corroborated the view that contextually embedded information is easier to learn and retain.
Keywords: anatomy; curriculum; learning; medical education.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
-
- Bahner, D. P., Goldman, E., Way, D., Royall, N. A., & Liu, Y. T. (2014). The state of ultrasound education in US medical schools: Results of a national survey. Academic Medicine, 89, 1681-1686.
-
- Bahrick, H. P. (1984). Associations and organization in cognitive psychology: A reply to Neisser. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 36-37.
-
- Bandiera, G., Boucher, A., Neville, A., Kuper, A., & Hodges, B. (2013). Integration and timing of basic and clinical sciences education. Medical Teacher, 35, 381-387.
-
- Bell, A. V., Michalec, B., & Arenson, C. (2014). The (stalled) progress of interprofessional collaboration: The role of gender. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28, 98-102.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical