Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;33(6):960-968.
doi: 10.1002/ca.23632. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

The process of curricular integration and its effects on anatomical knowledge retention

Affiliations

The process of curricular integration and its effects on anatomical knowledge retention

Xian Zhao et al. Clin Anat. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: Integration has been recognized as an important aspect of medical education. After transitioning from a discipline-specific to a systems-based preclinical curriculum, we examined faculty perceptions of the integrated approach and also whether it would lead to better anatomy knowledge retention.

Methods: To understand faculty perspectives, we reviewed curricular materials, interviewed block directors, and observed educational sessions. We analyzed knowledge retention through a 27-question anatomy test, comparing scores from the last class of the discipline-based curriculum and the first two classes of the integrated curriculum.

Results: Planning integrated content involves purposeful ordering, is challenging for faculty, and requires additional resources. Evaluation of the integrated approach for anatomy content demonstrated a significant increase in knowledge retention (p = .012; 56.28% vs. 63.98% for old vs. new curriculum).

Conclusions: This study helps the understanding of what is required for curricular integration. Our anatomy evaluation results corroborated the view that contextually embedded information is easier to learn and retain.

Keywords: anatomy; curriculum; learning; medical education.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
    1. Bahner, D. P., Goldman, E., Way, D., Royall, N. A., & Liu, Y. T. (2014). The state of ultrasound education in US medical schools: Results of a national survey. Academic Medicine, 89, 1681-1686.
    1. Bahrick, H. P. (1984). Associations and organization in cognitive psychology: A reply to Neisser. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 36-37.
    1. Bandiera, G., Boucher, A., Neville, A., Kuper, A., & Hodges, B. (2013). Integration and timing of basic and clinical sciences education. Medical Teacher, 35, 381-387.
    1. Bell, A. V., Michalec, B., & Arenson, C. (2014). The (stalled) progress of interprofessional collaboration: The role of gender. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28, 98-102.

LinkOut - more resources