Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Apr 3;117(14):243-250.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0243.

Peritoneal Flap in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Peritoneal Flap in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Johannes Bründl et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. .

Abstract

Background: Lymphocele is the most common complication arising after pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in the setting of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). The only data available until now on the utility of a peritoneal flap to prevent lymphocele were retrospectively acquired.

Methods: A randomized, controlled, multi-center trial with blinded assessment of endpoints was carried out on 232 patients with prostate cancer who underwent RARP with PLND. The patients in the intervention group were given a peritoneal flap; in the control group, surgery was performed without this modification. The two joint primary endpoints were the rates of symptomatic lymphocele during the same hospitalization as the operative procedure (iT1) and within 90 days of surgery (iT2). The secondary endpoints were lymphocele volume, the need for treatment of lymphocele, complications requiring an intervention, and the degree of postoperative stress incontinence. German Clinical Trials Register number: DRKS00011115.

Results: The data were evaluated in an intention-to-treat analysis, which, in this trial, was identical to an as-treated analysis. 108 patients (46.6%) were allotted to the intervention group. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences with respect to any clinical or histopathological criteria. A median of 16 lymph nodes were removed (interquartile range, 11-21). A symptomatic lymphocele arose in 1.3% (iT1) and 9.1% (iT2) of the patients, without any statistically significant difference between the two trial groups (p = 0.599 and p = 0.820, respectively). Nor did the groups differ significantly with respect to lymphocele volume (p = 0.670 on hospital discharge [T1], p = 0.650 90 days after surgery [T2]) or the type and frequency of need for subsequent surgical intervention (p = 0.535; iT2). 81.5% of all patients (n = 189) had no complications at all in the first three months after surgery. Nor were there any intergroup differences at 90 days with respect to the degree of stress urinary incontinence (p = 0.306) or complications (p = 0.486).

Conclusion: A peritoneal flap after RARP was not found to influence the rate of postoperative lymphocele, whether asymptomatic or requiring treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE
FIGURE
CONSORT flow diagram of the PIANOFORTE study CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; PLND, pelvic lymph node dissection; RARP, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
eFigure
eFigure
Peritoneal flap (intraoperative pelvic view): a) Dissection of what will later become the peritoneal flap at the start of the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) by bilateral incisions lateral to the medial umbilical fold (cranial margin of the peritoneal flap, left [A] and right [B], respectively) b) Release of the peritoneal flap and the caudally adjacent urinary bladder from the anterior abdominal wall by bilateral transection of the medial umbilical fold. c) After completion of the vesicourethral anastomosis (*) and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), the cranial margin of the peritoneal flap (A/B) is fixed to the perivesical adipose tissue of the lateral (anterior) bladder wall (C/D) by two interrupted vicryl sutures (A→C; B→D). d) After completion of the peritoneal flap, the anterior and lateral portions of the bladder are covered with peritoneum in the direction of the PLND bed.

Comment in

  • Urological Oncology: Prostate Cancer.
    Taneja SS. Taneja SS. J Urol. 2021 May;205(5):1515-1517. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001673. Epub 2021 Feb 24. J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33625902 No abstract available.

References

    1. Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister e. V. (GEKID) und Zentrum für Krebsregisterdaten (ZfKD) im Robert Koch-Institut. Krebs in Deutschland für 2015/2016. Stand 6.12.2017 (Schätzung Prostatakrebs für 2020) www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/DE/Content/Publikationen/Krebs_in_Deutschland/kr... (last accessed on 15 January 2020)
    1. Bohmer D, Wirth M, Miller K, Budach V, Heidenreich A, Wiegel T. Radiotherapy and hormone treatment in prostate cancer. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016;113:235–241. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2017;71:618–629. - PubMed
    1. D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998;280:969–974. - PubMed
    1. Herden J, Ansmann L, Ernstmann N, Schnell D, Weissbac L. The treatment of localized prostate cancer in everyday practice in Germany. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016;113:329–336. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types