Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 25;21(1):425.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04287-1.

Efficacy of a training programme to support the application of the guideline evidence-based health information: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Julia Lühnen  1 , Birte Berger-Höger  2 , Burkhard Haastert  3 , Jana Hinneburg  2 , Jürgen Kasper  4   5 , Anke Steckelberg  2
Affiliations

Efficacy of a training programme to support the application of the guideline evidence-based health information: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Julia Lühnen et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: The evidence-based guideline entitled guideline evidence-based health information emerged from the German Network for Evidence-based Medicine (DNEbM) and was published in February 2017. The guideline addresses providers of health information and its goal is to improve the quality of health information. In addition, we explored the competences of providers of health information and developed a training programme. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a training programme addressing providers of health information to support the application of the guideline evidence-based health information. We expected the intervention to improve the quality of health information in comparison to the provision of the guideline on its own.

Methods/design: The trial uses a superiority randomised control group design with 10 months' follow-up. Twenty-six providers of health information (groups with up to ten members) will be enrolled to compare the intervention (guideline and training programme) with usual care (a publicly available guideline). The 5-day training programme comprises an evidence-based medicine training module and a module to prepare the application of the guideline. The primary outcome parameter is the quality of the health information. Quality is operationalised as the extent of adherence to the guideline's recommendations. Each provider will prepare a single health information item informing a health-related decision on a topic freely chosen before randomisation. The quality of this information will be rated using the Mapping Health Information Quality (MAPPinfo) Checklist. An accompanying process evaluation will then be conducted.

Discussion: The study results should show whether the efficacy of the intervention justifies implementation of the training programme to enhance health information developers' competences in evidence-based medicine and to ensure high-quality evidence-based health information (EBHI) in the long term.

Trial registration: ISRCTN registry, ID: ISRCTN96941060. Registered on 7 March 2019.

Keywords: Evidence-based medicine; Guideline evidence-based health information; Guideline implementation, training programme; Health information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Modular training structure
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) Figure
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Data flow
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lühnen J, Albrecht M, Mühlhauser I, Steckelberg A. Leitlinie evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsinformation. [Guideline evidence-based health information]. Hamburg; 2017. http://www.leitlinie-gesundheitsinformation.de/. Accessed 5 Feb 2019.
    1. Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Michie S. A measure of informed choice. Health Expect. 2001;4(2):99–108. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00140.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rummer A, Scheibler F. Patientenrechte: Informierte Entscheidung als patientenrelevanter Endpunkt. [Patient rights: informed choice as a patient-relevant outcome] Dtsch Arztebl. 2016;113(8):322–324.
    1. Braun B, Marstedt G. Partizipative Entscheidungsfindung beim Arzt: Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. [Shared decision-making: entitlement and reality] In: Böcken J, Braun B, Meierjürgen R, editors. Gesundheitsmonitor 2014. Bürgerorientierung im Gesundheitswesen. Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung; 2014. pp. 107–131.
    1. General Medical Council: Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. 2009. https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/con.... Accessed 5 Feb 2019.

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources