Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2020 Jun 11;55(6):1900953.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.00953-2019. Print 2020 Jun.

ERS/ESTS/EACTS/ESTRO guidelines for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Affiliations
Free article
Practice Guideline

ERS/ESTS/EACTS/ESTRO guidelines for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Arnaud Scherpereel et al. Eur Respir J. .
Free article

Abstract

The European Respiratory Society (ERS)/European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS)/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) task force brought together experts to update previous 2009 ERS/ESTS guidelines on management of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), a rare cancer with globally poor outcome, after a systematic review of the 2009-2018 literature. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The evidence syntheses were discussed and recommendations formulated by this multidisciplinary group of experts. Diagnosis: pleural biopsies remain the gold standard to confirm the diagnosis, usually obtained by thoracoscopy but occasionally via image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy in cases of pleural symphysis or poor performance status. Pathology: standard staining procedures are insufficient in ∼10% of cases, justifying the use of specific markers, including BAP-1 and CDKN2A (p16) for the separation of atypical mesothelial proliferation from MPM. Staging: in the absence of a uniform, robust and validated staging system, we advise using the most recent 2016 8th TNM (tumour, node, metastasis) classification, with an algorithm for pre-therapeutic assessment. Monitoring: patient's performance status, histological subtype and tumour volume are the main prognostic factors of clinical importance in routine MPM management. Other potential parameters should be recorded at baseline and reported in clinical trials. Treatment: (chemo)therapy has limited efficacy in MPM patients and only selected patients are candidates for radical surgery. New promising targeted therapies, immunotherapies and strategies have been reviewed. Because of limited data on the best combination treatment, we emphasise that patients who are considered candidates for a multimodal approach, including radical surgery, should be treated as part of clinical trials in MPM-dedicated centres.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: A. Scherpereel reports personal fees for advisory board work from AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche and Janssen, non-financial support for meeting attendance from BMS, MSD and Roche, institutional support for clinical trial participation from Astra-Zeneca/MedImmune, BMS, Verastem and Bayer, grants from BMS, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: I. Opitz has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Berghmans has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I. Psallidas works as a Medical Science Director for AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work; membership of the task force was resigned when this position became effective. Conflict of interest: M. Glatzer has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Rigau works as methodologist for the European Respiratory Society. Conflict of interest: P. Astoul has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Bölükbas has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Boyd is an employee of the European Respiratory Society. Conflict of interest: J. Coolen has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. De Bondt has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. De Ruysscher reports grants from Bristol-Myers-Squibb AstraZeneca, Celgene, Roche/Genentech and Merck/ Pfizer, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: V. Durieux has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Faivre-Finn has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Fennell reports personal fees and non-financial support from BMS and MSD, non-financial support from Eli Lilly, Clovis, Bergen Bio and Pierre Fabre, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Roche-Genentech, personal fees from Aldeyra, during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: F. Galateau-Salle has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Greillier reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Roche and Novartis, personal fees and non-financial support from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Abbvie and MSD, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M.A. Hoda has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: W. Klepetko has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Lacourt has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. McElnay was employed by GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: N.A. Maskell has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Mutti has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J-C. Pairon reports grants from Santé Publique France Agency and French National Health Insurance (CNAM-TS), outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P. Van Schil has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.P. van Meerbeeck has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Waller has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: W. Weder reports personal fees from AstraZeneca for advisory board work and lectures, grants and personal fees for lectures from Covidien. Conflict of interest: G. Cardillo has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P.M. Putora reports grants from AstraZeneca and Celgene, outside the submitted work.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources