Trends in Reoperation for Surgical Site Infection After Spinal Surgery With Instrumentation in a Multicenter Study
- PMID: 32453234
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003545
Trends in Reoperation for Surgical Site Infection After Spinal Surgery With Instrumentation in a Multicenter Study
Abstract
Study design: A multicenter retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database.
Objective: To examine the characteristics of reoperation for surgical site infection (SSI) after spinal instrumentation surgery, including the efficacy of treatment for SSI and instrumentation retention.
Summary of background data: Aging of the population and advances in surgical techniques have increased the demand for spinal surgery in elderly patients. Treatment of SSI after this surgery has the main goals of eliminating infection and retaining instrumentation.
Methods: The subjects were 16,707 patients who underwent spine surgery with instrumentation in 11 hospitals affiliated with the Nagoya Spine Group from 2004 to 2015. Details of those requiring reoperations for SSI were obtained from surgical records at each hospital.
Results: There were significant increases in the mean age at the time of surgery (54.6-63.7 years) and the number of instrumentation surgeries (726-1977) from 2004 to 2015. The incidence of reoperation for SSI varied from 0.9% to 1.8%, with a decreasing trend over time. Reoperation for SSI was performed in 206 cases (115 men, 91 women; mean age 63.2 years). The average number of reoperations (1.4 vs. 2.3, P < 0.05), time from SSI to first reoperation (4.3 vs. 9.5 days, P < 0.05), and the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus identification rate (20% vs. 37%, P < 0.01) were all significantly lower in cases with instrumentation retention (n = 145) compared to those with instrumentation removal (n = 61).
Conclusion: There were marked trends of aging of patients and an increase in operations over the study period; however, the incidences of reoperation and instrumentation removal due to SSI significantly decreased over the same period. Rapid debridement after SSI diagnosis may have contributed to instrumentation retention. These results can serve as a guide for developing strategies for SSI treatment and for improved planning of spine surgery in an aging society.
Level of evidence: 3.
References
-
- Kobayashi K, Imagama S, Sato K, et al. Postoperative complications associated with spine surgery in patients over 90 years old: a multicenter retrospective study. Global Spine J 2018; 8:887–891.
-
- Kobayashi K, Imagama S, Ando K, et al. Complications associated with spine surgery in patients aged 80 years or older: Japan Association of Spine Surgeons with Ambition (JASA) multicenter study. Global Spine J 2017; 7:636–641.
-
- Kobayashi K, Imagama S, Ando K, et al. Risk factors for delirium after spine surgery in extremely elderly patients aged 80 years or older and review of the literature: Japan Association of Spine Surgeons with Ambition (JASA) multicenter study. Global Spine J 2017; 7:560–656.
-
- Deyo RA, Mirza SK. Trends and variations in the use of spine surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 443:139–146.
-
- Schuster JM, Rechtine G, Norvell DC, et al. The influence of perioperative risk factors and therapeutic interventions on infection rates after spine surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35:S125–S137.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
