Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 24;17(10):3699.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103699.

Physiological Predictors of Competition Performance in CrossFit Athletes

Affiliations

Physiological Predictors of Competition Performance in CrossFit Athletes

Rafael Martínez-Gómez et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the physiological variables that predict competition performance during a CrossFit competition. Fifteen male amateur CrossFit athletes (age, 35 ± 9 years; CrossFit experience, 40 ± 27 months) performed a series of laboratory-based tests (incremental load test for deep full squat and bench press; squat, countermovement and drop jump tests; and incremental running and Wingate tests) that were studied as potential predictors of CrossFit performance. Thereafter, they performed the five Workouts of the Day (WODs) corresponding to the CrossFit Games Open 2019, and we assessed the relationship between the laboratory-based markers and CrossFit performance with regression analyses. Overall CrossFit performance (i.e., final ranking considering the sum of all WODs, as assessed by number of repetitions, time spent in exercises or weight lifted) was significantly related to jump ability, mean and peak power output during the Wingate test, relative maximum strength for the deep full squat and the bench press, and maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) and speed during the incremental test (all p < 0.05, r = 0.58-0.75). However, the relationship between CrossFit Performance and most laboratory markers varied depending on the analyzed WOD. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that measures of lower-body muscle power (particularly jump ability) and VO2max explained together most of the variance (R2 = 81%, p < 0.001) in overall CrossFit performance. CrossFit performance is therefore associated with different power-, strength-, and aerobic-related markers.

Keywords: VO2max; jump; laboratory tests; power; sport; strength.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the study protocol. Abbreviation: WOD, workout of the day.

References

    1. Claudino J.G., Gabbett T.J., Bourgeois F., Souza H.D.S., Miranda R.C., Mezêncio B., Soncin R., Filho C.A.C., Bottaro M., Hernandez A., et al. CrossFit Overview: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Med. Open. 2018;4:11. doi: 10.1186/s40798-018-0124-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Butcher S., Neyedly T.J., Horvey K.J., Benko C.R. Do physiological measures predict selected CrossFit® benchmark performance? Open Access. J. Sports Med. 2015;6:241–247. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S88265. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martínez-Gómez R., Valenzuela P.L., Barranco-Gil D., Moral-González S., García-González A., Lucia A. Full-Squat as a Determinant of Performance in Cross Fit. Int. J. Sports Med. 2019;40:592–596. doi: 10.1055/a-0960-9717. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bellar D., Hatchett A., Judge L.W., E Breaux M., Marcus L. The relationship of aerobic capacity, anaerobic peak power and experience to performance in CrossFit exercise. Boil. Sport. 2015;32:315–320. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1174771. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dexheimer J.D., Schroeder E.T., Sawyer B.J., Pettitt R.W., Aguinaldo A.L., Torrence W.A. Physiological Performance Measures as Indicators of CrossFit® Performance. Sports. 2019;7:93. doi: 10.3390/sports7040093. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources