Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 26;21(1):327.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03353-8.

Complications after surgical management of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of event terms and definitions

N Alispahic  1 , S Brorson  2 , C Bahrs  3 , A Joeris  4 , A Steinitz  5 , L Audigé  6   7   8
Affiliations

Complications after surgical management of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of event terms and definitions

N Alispahic et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: The most frequently used surgical procedures for treating a proximal humeral fracture (PHF) are plate osteosynthesis, nail osteosynthesis and arthroplasty. Evidence-based recommendations for an appropriate surgical procedure after PHF requires transparent and valid safety data. We performed a systematic review to examine reported terms and definitions of complications after surgically-treated PHFs.

Methods: A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus and WorldCat to identify clinical articles and book chapters on complications of PHF published from 2010 to 2017. Complication terms and definitions were extracted from each selected article independently by two reviewers and grouped according to a predefined scheme.

Results: From 1376 initial references, we selected 470 articles, of which 103 were reviewed in reverse chronological order until no further information was gained. Twelve book chapters were reviewed. We found 667 local event terms associated with complications after surgical treatment of PHFs. The most frequently used event terms were infection (52 references), nonunion (n = 42), malunion (n = 35), avascular necrosis (n = 27) and pain (n = 25). Overall, 345, 177, 257 and 102 local event terms were related to plating, nailing, arthroplasty and other surgical techniques, respectively. Radiological assessment was the basis for the majority of event terms and complication definitions. Thirty-six event definitions were extracted, mostly defining the terms "secondary fracture displacement", "screw perforation/cutout", "malunion", "delayed healing" and "notching".

Conclusion: Scientific literature on surgically-managed PHF uses different terms to describe complications and without approved definitions, which highlights a lack of agreement on adverse event terminology for PHFs. Defined event terms are mostly based on radiological observations. Consensus among shoulder surgeons on a core event set is indispensable to support the standardization of safety reporting for surgically-treated PHFs.

Keywords: Adverse events; Complications; Proximal humeral fractures; Standardization; Surgical treatment; Systematic literature review; Unfavorable events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Systematic review article selection flowchart. PHF = proximal humeral fracture. Reprinted with permission from Brorson et al. [14]
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72(4):365–371. doi: 10.1080/000164701753542023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olsson C, Nordqvist A, Petersson CJ. Increased fragility in patients with fracture of the proximal humerus: a case control study. Bone. 2004;34(6):1072–1077. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.01.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Audige L, Goldhahn S, Daigl M, Goldhahn J, Blauth M, Hanson B. How to document and report orthopedic complications in clinical studies? A proposal for standardization. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(2):269–275. doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1384-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gargon E, Gurung B, Medley N, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Williamson PR. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099111. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Dunn W, Matthews CE, Harrell FE, Jr, Dittus RS. Reading and reviewing the orthopaedic literature: a systematic, evidence-based medicine approach. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(4):220–229. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200507000-00002. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types