Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;33(6):1151-1165.
doi: 10.1111/jar.12752. Epub 2020 May 27.

The impact of self-advocacy organizations on the subjective well-being of people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review of the literature

Elizabeth Tilley  1 , Iva Strnadová  2 , Joanne Danker  2 , Jan Walmsley  3 , Julie Loblinzk  4
Affiliations

The impact of self-advocacy organizations on the subjective well-being of people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review of the literature

Elizabeth Tilley et al. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Background: A high sense of subjective well-being has been associated with more prosocial behaviours, better health, work productivity and positive relationships. The aim of this systematic review was to explore what impact self-advocacy has on the subjective well-being of people with intellectual disabilities.

Method: The authors reviewed articles focusing on the perspectives of adults with intellectual disabilities engaged with self-advocacy groups. Searches were performed in PsychINFO, Web of Science, SCOPUS, MEDLINE and CIHNL databases, resulting in 16 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. A framework synthesis approach was used to extract data deductively based on the Dynamic Model of Wellbeing.

Results: While self-advocacy has a positive impact on all domains of the Dynamic Model of Wellbeing, negative impacts associated with participation in a self-advocacy group were also reported.

Conclusions: The benefits of participating in self-advocacy groups on the well-being of individuals with intellectual disabilities outweigh the disadvantages.

Keywords: inclusive research; intellectual disabilities; self-advocacy; subjective well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abdallah, S., Mahony, S., Marks, N., Michaelson, J., Seaford, C., Stoll, L., & Thompson, S. (2011). Measuring our progress: The power of wellbeing. London UK: New Economics Foundation.
    1. Aknin, L. B., Sandstrom, G. M., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2011). Investing in others: Prosocial spending for (pro) social change. In R. Biswas-Diener (Ed.), Positive psychology in social change (pp. 219-234). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
    1. Anderson, S., & Bigby, B. (2017). Self-advocacy as a means to positive identities for people with intellectual disability: ‘We just help them, be them really’. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 30, 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12223
    1. Beart, S., Hardy, G., & Buchan, L. (2004). Changing selves: A grounded theory account of belonging to a self-advocacy group for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17, 91-100.
    1. Buchanan, I., & Walmsley, J. (2006). Self-advocacy in historical perspective. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(3), 133-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2006.00410.x

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources