Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;103(2):646-651.
doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0089. Epub 2020 May 21.

Risk Factors for Epidemic Cholera in Lusaka, Zambia-2017

Affiliations

Risk Factors for Epidemic Cholera in Lusaka, Zambia-2017

Francis H Nanzaluka et al. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

On October 6, 2017, the Zambia Ministry of Health declared a cholera outbreak in Lusaka. By December, 1,462 cases and 38 deaths had occurred (case fatality rate, 2.6%). We conducted a case-control study to identify risk factors and inform interventions. A case was any person with acute watery diarrhea (≥ 3 loose stools in 24 hours) admitted to a cholera treatment center in Lusaka from December 16 to 21, 2017. Controls were neighbors without diarrhea during the same time period. Up to two controls were matched to each case by age-group (1-4, 5-17, and ≥ 18 years) and neighborhood. Surveyors interviewed cases and controls, tested free chlorine residual (FCR) in stored water, and observed the presence of soap in the home. Conditional logistic regression was used to generate matched odds ratios (mORs) based on subdistricts and age-groups with 95% CIs. We enrolled 82 cases and 132 controls. Stored water in 71% of case homes had an FCR > 0.2 mg/L. In multivariable analyses, those who drank borehole water (mOR = 2.4, CI: 1.1-5.6), had close contact with a cholera case (mOR = 6.2, CI: 2.5-15), and were male (mOR = 2.5, CI: 1.4-5.0) had higher odds of being a cholera case than their matched controls. Based on these findings, we recommended health education about household water chlorination and hygiene in the home. Emergency responses included providing chlorinated water through emergency tanks and maintaining adequate FCR levels through close monitoring of water sources.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ali M, Nelson AR, Lopez AL, Sack DA, 2015. Updated global burden of cholera in endemic countries. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9: e0003832. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clemens JD, Nair GB, Ahmed T, Qadri F, Holmgren J, 2017. Cholera. Lancet 390: 1539–1549. - PubMed
    1. UNICEF , 2017. UNICEF Cholera Toolkit. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/cholera/index_71222.html. Accessed May 5, 2020.
    1. Davis W, Narra R, Mintz ED, 2018. Cholera. Curr Epidemiol Rep 5: 303–315. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Olu O, Babaniyi O, Songolo P, Matapo B, Chizema E, Kapin’a-Kanyanga M, Musenga E, Walker O, 2013. Cholera epidemiology in Zambia from 2000 to 2010: implications for improving cholera prevention and control strategies in the country. East Afr Med J 90: 324–331. - PubMed

MeSH terms