Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;17(5):1384-1390.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.13400. Epub 2020 May 27.

Cross-cultural adaptation, translation, and validation of the Spanish Foot and Ankle Outcome Score questionnaire

Affiliations

Cross-cultural adaptation, translation, and validation of the Spanish Foot and Ankle Outcome Score questionnaire

Emmanuel Navarro-Flores et al. Int Wound J. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

The Spanish Foot and Ankle Outcome Score questionnaire (FAOS-S) may be considered a health evaluation tool with 42 questions for assessing foot health disorders. To date, FAOS has been validated in different languages, but a Spanish version was lacking. Consequently, the purpose of this study was to translate and validate the Spanish version of the FAOS (FAOS es). A suitable method was developed for the translation protocol and cross-cultural validation from Swedish to Spanish. Regarding the total marks from each domain, agreement degrees and confidence were analysed using the Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. In addition, the mean ± SD differences between pretest and posttests were calculated and completed using of the Bland and Altman distribution plots. Excellent agreement between the two versions based on Cronbach's α was demonstrated. Five domains consisting of pain, symptoms of foot disorders, activities of daily living, sports and recreation, and foot and ankle quality of life were added together to obtain the total score. Excellent retest reliability was shown for the total score. Test/retest reliability was excellent for the pain, stiffness, other foot disorder-related symptoms, and quality of life domains. There were no significant differences among any domain (P > .05). There were no statistically significant differences (P = .000) for the mean ± SD differences between pretest and posttests (56.2524 ± 19.064 [51.98-60.52] and 57.45 ± 21.02 [52.74-62.16] points, respectively). Bland and Altman plots or clinically pertinent variations were not statistically significantly different. The FAOS is considered a strong and valid questionnaire with adequate repeatability in the Spanish community.

Keywords: health-related quality of life; pain measurement; questionnaire.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Bland–Altman plot showing the agreement between test and retest for the individual subscales and the total score. Dimensions: A, pain; B, other symptoms; C, activities daily living; D, sport and recreation function; E, foot and ankle RQL; F, total score

References

    1. Bennett PJ, Patterson C, Wearing S, Baglioni T. Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot‐health status. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1998;88(9):419‐428. - PubMed
    1. Jorgensen JE, Andreasen J, Rathleff MS. Translation and validation of the Danish foot function index (FFI‐DK). Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(4):e408‐e413. - PubMed
    1. Gijon‐Nogueron G, Ndosi M, Luque‐Suarez A, et al. Cross‐cultural adaptation and validation of the Manchester foot pain and disability index into Spanish. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(2):571‐579. - PubMed
    1. Paez‐Moguer J, Budiman‐Mak E, Cuesta‐Vargas AI. Cross‐cultural adaptation and validation of the foot function index to Spanish. Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;20(1):34‐39. - PubMed
    1. Hawke F, Burns J. Understanding the nature and mechanism of foot pain. J Foot Ankle Res. 2009;2(1):1. - PMC - PubMed