Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 27;15(1):39.
doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-00991-3.

Clinicians' attitudes and perceived barriers and facilitators to cancer treatment clinical practice guideline adherence: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative literature

Mia Bierbaum  1 , Frances Rapport  2 , Gaston Arnolda  2   3 , Brona Nic Giolla Easpaig  2   3 , Klay Lamprell  2   3 , Karen Hutchinson  2 , Geoff P Delaney  3   4   5   6 , Winston Liauw  3   5   7 , Richard Kefford  3   8 , Ian Olver  3   9 , Jeffrey Braithwaite  2   3
Affiliations

Clinicians' attitudes and perceived barriers and facilitators to cancer treatment clinical practice guideline adherence: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative literature

Mia Bierbaum et al. Implement Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) synthesize the best available evidence to guide clinician and patient decision making. There are a multitude of barriers and facilitators to clinicians adhering to CPGs; however, little is known about active cancer treatment CPG adherence specifically. This systematic review sought to identify clinician attitudes, and perceived barriers and facilitators to active cancer treatment CPG adherence.

Methods: A systematic search was undertaken of five databases; Ovid Medline, PsychInfo, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and PROQUEST. The retrieved abstracts were screened for eligibility against inclusion criteria, and a full text review was conducted of all eligible studies. Data were extracted, and a quality assessment was conducted of all included studies. The qualitative papers were thematically analyzed. Attitudes, barriers, and facilitating factors extracted from the quantitative papers were categorized within the qualitative thematic framework.

Results: The search resulted in the identification of 9676 titles. After duplicates were removed, abstracts screened, and full texts reviewed, 15 studies were included. Four themes were identified which related to negative clinician attitudes and barriers to active cancer treatment CPG adherence: (1) concern over CPG content and currency of CPGs; (2) concern about the evidence underpinning CPGs; (3) clinician uncertainty and negative perceptions of CPGs; and (4) organizational and patient factors. The review also identified four themes related to positive attitudes and facilitators to active cancer treatment CPG adherence: (5) CPG accessibility and ease of use; (6) endorsement and dissemination of CPGs and adequate access to treatment facilities and resources; (7) awareness of CPGs and belief in their relevance; and (8) belief that CPGs support decision making, improve patient care, reduce clinical variation, and reduce costs.

Conclusion: These results highlight that adherence to active cancer treatment CPG recommendations by oncology clinicians is influenced by multiple factors such as attitudes, practices, and access to resources. The review has also revealed many similarities and differences in the factors associated with general CPG, and active cancer treatment CPG, adherence. These findings will inform tailored implementation strategies to increase adherence to cancer treatment CPGs.

Trial registration: PROSPERO (2019) CRD42019125748.

Keywords: Clinical Practice Guidelines; Evidence-based practice; Guideline adherent treatment; Implementation Science; Oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of search strategy [52]
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Grol R. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Medical Care. 2001:II46–54. - PubMed
    1. Harrison M, Légaré F, Graham I, Fervers B. Adapting clinical practice guidelines to local context and assessing barriers to their use. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2010;182(2):E78–E84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gabbay J, le May A. Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed “mindlines?” Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. BMJ. 2004;329(7473):1013. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Twaddle S. Clinical practice guidelines. Singapore Medical Journal. 2005;46(12):681. - PubMed
    1. Bierbaum M, Braithwaite J, Arnolda G, Delaney GP, Liauw W, Kefford R, et al. Clinicians’ attitudes to oncology clinical practice guidelines and the barriers and facilitators to adherence: a mixed methods study protocol. BMJ open. 2020;0:e035448. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms