Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Oct;43(10):2349-2354.
doi: 10.2337/dc20-0016. Epub 2020 May 27.

The Relationship Between CGM-Derived Metrics, A1C, and Risk of Hypoglycemia in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

Affiliations
Observational Study

The Relationship Between CGM-Derived Metrics, A1C, and Risk of Hypoglycemia in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

Elena Toschi et al. Diabetes Care. 2020 Oct.

Erratum in

Abstract

Objective: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is now commonly used in the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D). The CGM-derived coefficient of variation (CV) measures glucose variability, and the glucose management indicator (GMI) measures mean glycemia (previously called estimated A1C). However, their relationship with laboratory-measured A1C and the risk of hypoglycemia in older adults with T1D is not well studied.

Research design and methods: In a single-center study, older adults (age ≥65 years) with T1D wore a CGM device for 14 days. The CV (%) and GMI were calculated, and A1C and clinical and demographic information were collected.

Results: We evaluated 130 older adults (age 71 ± 5 years), of whom 55% were women, 97% were White, diabetes duration was 39 ± 17 years, and A1C was 7.3 ± 0.6% (56 ± 15 mmol/mol). Participants were stratified by high CV (>36%; n = 77) and low CV (≤36%; n = 53). Although there was no difference in A1C levels between the groups with high and low CV (7.3% [56 mmol/mol] vs. 7.3% [53 mmol/mol], P = 0.4), the high CV group spent more time in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL and ≤54 mg/dL) compared with the group with low CV (median 31 vs. 84 min/day, P < 0.0001; 8 vs. 46 min/day, P < 0.001, respectively). An absolute difference between A1C and GMI of ≥0.5% was observed in 46% of the cohort. When the A1C was higher than the GMI by ≥0.5%, a higher duration of hypoglycemia was observed (P = 0.02).

Conclusions: In older adults with T1D, the use of CGM-derived CV and GMI can better identify individuals at higher risk for hypoglycemia compared with A1C alone. These measures should be combined with A1C for better diabetes management in older adults with T1D.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03078491.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between CV% and time spent in hypoglycemia (min/day). Sensor glucose <70 mg/dL (A) and ≤54 mg/dL (B). Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and P value are shown in each panel.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Absolute difference between A1C and GMI. Historical cohort vs. older adults with T1D.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Munshi MN, Segal AR, Suhl E, et al. . Frequent hypoglycemia among elderly patients with poor glycemic control. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:362–364 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dhaliwal R, Foster NC, Boyle C, et al. . Determinants of fracture in adults with type 1 diabetes in the USA: results from the T1D exchange clinic registry. J Diabetes Complications 2018;32:1006–1011 - PubMed
    1. Lipska KJ, Kosiborod M. Hypoglycemia and adverse outcomes: marker or mediator? Rev Cardiovasc Med 2011;12:132–135 - PubMed
    1. Weinstock RS, DuBose SN, Bergenstal RM, et al. .; T1D Exchange Severe Hypoglycemia in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Study Group . Risk factors associated with severe hypoglycemia in older adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2016;39:603–610 - PubMed
    1. Stahn A, Pistrosch F, Ganz X, et al. . Relationship between hypoglycemic episodes and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases: silent hypoglycemias and silent arrhythmias. Diabetes Care 2014;37:516–520 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data