Influence of de-remineralization process on chemical, microstructural, and mechanical properties of human and bovine dentin
- PMID: 32462276
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03371-9
Influence of de-remineralization process on chemical, microstructural, and mechanical properties of human and bovine dentin
Abstract
Objectives: This study compared the chemical composition, microstructural, and mechanical properties of human and bovine dentin subjected to a demineralization/remineralization process.
Materials and methods: Human and bovine incisors were sectioned to obtain 120 coronal dentin beams (6 × 1 × 1 mm3) that were randomly allocated into 4 subgroups (n = 15) according to the time of treatment (sound, pH-cycling for 3, 7, and 14 days). Three-point bending mechanical test, attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR), thermogravimetric (TG), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques were employed to characterize the dentin samples.
Results: Regarding chemical composition at the molecular level, bovine sound dentin showed significantly lower values in organic and inorganic content (collagen cross-linking, CO3/amide I, and CO3/PO4; p = 0.002, p = 0.026, and p = 0.002, respectively) compared to humans. Employing XRD analyses, a higher mineral crystallinity in human dentin than in bovines at 7 and 14 days (p = 0.003 and p = 0.009, respectively) was observed. At the end of the pH-cycling, CI (ATR-FTIR) and CO3/PO4 ratios (ATR-FTIR) increased, while CO3/amide I (ATR-FTIR), PO4/amide I (ATR-FTIR), and %mineral (TG) ratios decreased. The extension by compression values increased over exposure time with significant differences between dentin types (p < 0.001, in all cases), reaching higher values in bovine dentin. However, flexural strength (MPa) did not show differences between groups. We also observed the correlation between compositional variables (i.e., PO4/amide I, CI, and %mineral) and the extension by compression.
Conclusions: Human and bovine dentin are different in terms of microstructure, chemical composition, mechanical strength, and in their response to the demineralization/remineralization process by pH-cycling.
Clinical relevance: These dissimilarities may constitute a potential limitation when replacing human teeth with bovines in in vitro studies.
Keywords: Biomechanics; Bovine dentin; Chemical composition; Demineralization; Human dentin; Remineralization.
References
-
- Yassen GH, Platt JA, Hara AT (2011) Bovine teeth as substitute for human teeth in dental research: a review of literature. J Oral Sci 53:273–282. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.53.273 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Soares FZM, Follak A, da Rosa LS, Montagner AF, Lenzi TL, Rocha RO (2016) Bovine tooth is a substitute for human tooth on bond strength studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Dent Mater 32:1385–1393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.019 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T (1983) Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res 62:1076–1081. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620101501 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wegehaupt FJ, Widmer R, Attin T (2010) Is bovine dentine an appropriate substitute in abrasion studies? Clin Oral Investig 14:201–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0283-3 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Tanaka JLO, Medici Filho E, Salgado JAP, Salgado MAC, Moraes LC, Moraes MEL, Castilho JCM (2008) Comparative analysis of human and bovine teeth: radiographic density. Braz Oral Res 22:346–351. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242008000400011 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
