Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;29(2):779-785.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05547-1. Epub 2020 May 28.

Patient acceptance of prehabilitation for major surgery: an exploratory survey

Affiliations

Patient acceptance of prehabilitation for major surgery: an exploratory survey

Jamie L Waterland et al. Support Care Cancer. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Prehabilitation programs are effective in optimising patient's functional reserve prior to surgery and increasingly associated with reduced postoperative complications. However, acceptability of programs among patients is largely unknown. This study set out to explore the acceptability of prehabilitation from the perspective of patients awaiting major cancer surgery.

Methods: Adult patients awaiting major gastrointestinal and urological cancer surgeries were surveyed. Patients were excluded if they were unable to complete the survey due to language, intellectual impairment and/or visual/hearing deficit. The survey was designed to explore categories related to patient demographics, level of physical activity and perceived enablers and barriers to prehabilitation.

Results: One hundred and three participants presenting to a pre-anaesthesia clinic completed the survey over a 5-month period, with 83% response rate. Approximately, half of the respondents were female (55%) and were currently physically active (53%). Fewer than one third (30%) felt they completed 'enough exercise'. The majority of participants (83%) were unfamiliar with the concept of prehabilitation but two thirds (68%) were interested in such a program after explanation. The majority of participants (72%) indicated a strong preference to exercise in a home-based environment. Medical recommendation increased willingness to participate (p < 0.001), while program costs (p = 0.01) were potential barriers to participation.

Conclusion: Patients are willing to participate in prehabilitation prior to major cancer surgery but practical barriers and facilitators should be considered when designing prehabilitation programs to maximise patient commitment to facilitate improved postoperative outcomes.

Keywords: Cancer; Prehabilitation; Program design; Surgery; Survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Carli F, Silver JK, Feldman LS, McKee A, Gilman S, Gillis C, Scheede-Bergdahl C, Gamsa A, Stout N, Hirsch B (2017) Surgical prehabilitation in patients with cancer: state-of-the-science and recommendations for future research from a panel of subject matter experts. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 28(1):49–64 - DOI
    1. Barberan-Garcia A, Ubre M, Roca J, Lacy AM, Burgos F, Risco R, Momblan D, Balust J, Blanco I, Martinez-Palli G (2018) Personalised prehabilitation in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a randomized blinded controlled trial. Ann Surg 267(1):50–56 - DOI
    1. Boden I, Skinner EH, Browning L, Reeve J, Anderson L, Hill S, Robertson IK, Story D, Denehy L (2018) Preoperative physiotherapy for the prevention of respiratory complications after upper abdominal surgery: pragmatic, double blinded, multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ 360 (j5916)
    1. Sebio Garcia R, Yanez Brage MI, Gimenez Moolhuyzen E, Granger CL, Denehy L (2016) Functional and postoperative outcomes after preoperative exercise training in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 23(3):486–497 - DOI
    1. Moran J, Guinan E, McCormick P, Larkin J, Mockler D, Hussey J, Moriarty J, Wilson F (2016) The ability of prehabilitation to influence postoperative outcome after intra-abdominal operation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 160(5):1189–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.014 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources