Using Bronchoscopic Lung Cryobiopsy and a Genomic Classifier in the Multidisciplinary Diagnosis of Diffuse Interstitial Lung Diseases
- PMID: 32464189
- PMCID: PMC8039001
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.532
Using Bronchoscopic Lung Cryobiopsy and a Genomic Classifier in the Multidisciplinary Diagnosis of Diffuse Interstitial Lung Diseases
Abstract
Background: Challenges remain for establishing a specific diagnosis in cases of interstitial lung disease (ILD). Bronchoscopic lung cryobiopsy (BLC) has impacted the diagnostic impression and confidence of multidisciplinary discussions (MDDs) in the evaluation of ILD. Reports indicate that a genomic classifier (GC) can distinguish usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) from non-UIP.
Research question: What is the impact of sequentially presented data from BLC and GC on the diagnostic confidence of MDDs in diagnosing ILD?
Study design and methods: Two MDD teams met to discuss 24 patients with ILD without a definitive UIP pattern. MDD1 sequentially reviewed clinical-radiologic findings, BLC, and GC. MDD2 sequentially reviewed GC before BLC. At each step in the process the MDD diagnosis and confidence level were recorded.
Results: MDD1 had a significant increase in diagnostic confidence, from 43% to 93% (P = .023), in patients with probable UIP after the addition of GC to BLC. MDD2 had an increase in diagnostic confidence, from 27% to 73% (P = .074), after the addition of BLC to GC. The concordance coefficients and percentage agreement of categorical idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF diagnoses were as follows: GC vs MDD1: 0.92, 96%; GC vs MDD2: 0.83, 92%; BLC1 vs MDD1: 0.67, 83%; BLC2 vs MDD2: 0.66, 83%.
Interpretation: GC increased diagnostic confidence when added to BLC for patients with a probable UIP pattern, and in appropriate clinical settings can be used without BLC. In contrast, BLC had the greatest impact regarding a specific diagnosis when the likelihood of UIP was considered low following clinical-radiographic review.
Keywords: bronchoscopy; cryobiopsy; genomic classifier; interstitial lung diseases; multidisciplinary discussion.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Moving From Multidisciplinary Phenotyping to Biological Classification of Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease.Chest. 2020 Nov;158(5):1814-1815. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.021. Chest. 2020. PMID: 33160524 No abstract available.
References
-
- Hetzel J., Maldonado F., Ravaglia C. Transbronchial cryobiopsies for the diagnosis of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases: expert statement from the cryobiopsy working group on safety and utility and a call for standardization of the procedure. Respiration. 2018;95(3):188–200. - PubMed
-
- Tomassetti S., Wells A.U., Costabel U. Bronchoscopic lung cryobiopsy increases diagnostic confidence in the multidisciplinary diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193(7) 745-742. - PubMed
-
- Ravaglia C., Bonifazi M., Wells A.U. Safety and diagnostic yield of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy in diffuse parenchymal lung diseases: a comparative study versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lung biopsy and a systematic review of the literature. Respiration. 2016;91(3):215–227. - PubMed
-
- Raghu G., Flaherty K.R., Lederer D.J. Use of a molecular classifier to identify usual interstitial pneumonia in conventional transbronchial lung biopsy samples: a prospective validation study. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(6):487–496. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
