Contaminants, mutagenicity and toxicity in the surface waters of Kyiv, Ukraine
- PMID: 32469773
- PMCID: PMC8684704
- DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111153
Contaminants, mutagenicity and toxicity in the surface waters of Kyiv, Ukraine
Abstract
Kyiv is Ukraine's capital and largest city. Home to 3 million people, this area has a rich history of agriculture and industry. The Dnieper River is Ukraine's largest river and it passes through the center of Kyiv. Little information on emerging and legacy compounds or their toxicity in the Dnieper River exists. For this investigation, water was sampled for PAHs, PCBs, metals and emerging contaminants including pharmaceuticals and personal care products. The effects of surface waters in the Dnieper were evaluated using the Ames, chronic and acute daphnia, and a ciliate (Colpoda stennii) assays. Concentrations of legacy and emerging contaminants were found in seven stations near the municipal water treatment plant (MWTP) and receiving waters. The MWTP appeared to remove some of the emerging contaminants, however the legacy compounds (PCBs and PAHs) were not affected by the MWTP and appeared to be more wide-spread indicating a number of sources to the Dnieper River. Acute and chronic toxicity were associated with the influent and effluent of the MWTP, however mutagenicity was noted in surface waters throughout the Dnieper River including upstream of the MWTP. This study provides the first snapshot of possible human health and ecological risks associated with surface waters of the Dnieper. More research on seasonal changes and sources of toxicity, mutagenicity and contaminants would aid in completing a more comprehensive risk assessment of surface waters of the Dnieper River.
Keywords: Aquatic toxicity; Dnieper; Emerging contaminants; Kyiv, Ukraine; Legacy contaminants; Mutagenicity.
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures











References
-
- Abdel-Shafy HI, Mansour MSM (2016) A review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Source, environmental impact, effect on human health and remediation. Egyptian J of Petrol. 25(1):107–123
-
- Ames BN, McCann J (1981) Validation of the Salmonella test: A reply to Rinkus and Legator. Cancer Res. 41:4192–4203 - PubMed
-
- Ames BN, McCann J, Yamasaki E (1975) Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutation Res. 31:347–364 - PubMed
-
- Ball JC, Greene B, Young W, Richert JFO, Salmeen IT (1990) S9-Activated Ames assays of diesel-particle extracts. Detecting indirect-acting mutagens in samples that are direct-acting. Environ. Sci. Technol 24(6):890–894
-
- Bragin GE, Parkerton TF, Redman AD, Letinksi DJ, Butler JD, Paumen ML, Sutherland CA, Knarr TM, Comber M, den Haan K (2016) Chronic toxicity of selected polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to algae and crustaceans using passive dosing. Environ. Toxicol. and Chem 35(12):2948–2957 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources