Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233540.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233540. eCollection 2020.

Training specificity performing single-joint vs. multi-joint resistance exercises among physically active females: A randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Training specificity performing single-joint vs. multi-joint resistance exercises among physically active females: A randomized controlled trial

Nicolay Stien et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Resistance-training of the lower limbs can be performed using exercises moving one (single-joint exercises) or several joints (multi-joint exercises). This study compared the effects of training one multi-joint exercise (leg press) or two single-joint exercises (leg extension and kickback) on dynamic and isometric strength and the transferability of dynamic strength between exercises. Fifty-three physically active women were randomized to a multi-joint (MJ) training group (age = 21.95±0.82 years, mass = 64.85±5.76 kg, height = 167.35±2.47 cm; n = 20), single-joint (SJ) training group (age = 22.56±1.66 years, mass = 64.85±5.76 kg, height = 165.94±2.84 cm; n = 18), or a control (CON) group (age = 21.27±0.68 years, mass = 68.43±4.86 kg, height = 168.63±2.84 cm; n = 15). The training groups participated in an 8-week supervised single- or multi-joint lower limb training consisting of 18 sessions. Pre- and post-training, six repetitions maximum (RM) and maximal voluntary isometric contraction in the three exercises were assessed, along with electromyography of the superficial quadriceps muscles. Improvements in all dynamic exercises were greatest after training the specific exercises (ES = 1.26-2.14, P<0.001-0.025) and all were greater in the training groups than in the CON group (ES = 1.43-3.31, P<0.001-0.021). The SJ group improved 6RM in leg extension and kickback more than leg press (ES = 1.51 and 2.04, respectively, P<0.001), whereas the MJ group improved leg press 6RM more than kickback (ES = 1.10, P = 0.002). However, leg press and leg extension strength improved similarly in the MJ group (ES = 0.54, P = 0.072). All strength and electromyographic measures remained unchanged in the CON group (ES = 0.00-0.44, P = 0.412-0.966). Improved dynamic strength in leg press, kickback and leg extension is best attained by training the specific exercises, but both training modalities can improve strength across all exercises.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Starting position for the a) leg press, b) leg extension, and c) kickback.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Absolute change (kg) in 6RM strength from pre- to post-test for the control (white bar), SJ (gray bar) and MJ groups (black bar). Error bars represent 95% confidence interval. * = Significant change from pre- to post-test (P < 0.001). † = Significantly lower change than the training groups (P < 0.01). # = Significant difference between training groups (P < 0.01). ** = Significant difference between exercises (P < 0.01).
Fig 3
Fig 3
Accumulated volume (kg) throughout the training period for the SJ (grey line) and MJ group (black line). Error bars represent 95% confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wernbom M, Augustsson J, Thomee R. The influence of frequency, intensity, volume and mode of strength training on whole muscle cross-sectional area in humans. Sports Med. 2007;37(3):225–64. - PubMed
    1. Sale D, MacDougall D. Specificity in strength training: a review for the coach and athlete. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1981;6(2):87–92. - PubMed
    1. Behm DG, Sale DG. Velocity specificity of resistance training. Sports Med. 1993;15(6):374–88. - PubMed
    1. Appleby BB, Cormack SJ, Newton RU. Specificity and Transfer of Lower-Body Strength: Influence of Bilateral or Unilateral Lower-Body Resistance Training. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33(2):318–26. - PubMed
    1. ACSM. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(3):687–708. - PubMed

Publication types