Training specificity performing single-joint vs. multi-joint resistance exercises among physically active females: A randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 32469946
- PMCID: PMC7259582
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233540
Training specificity performing single-joint vs. multi-joint resistance exercises among physically active females: A randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Resistance-training of the lower limbs can be performed using exercises moving one (single-joint exercises) or several joints (multi-joint exercises). This study compared the effects of training one multi-joint exercise (leg press) or two single-joint exercises (leg extension and kickback) on dynamic and isometric strength and the transferability of dynamic strength between exercises. Fifty-three physically active women were randomized to a multi-joint (MJ) training group (age = 21.95±0.82 years, mass = 64.85±5.76 kg, height = 167.35±2.47 cm; n = 20), single-joint (SJ) training group (age = 22.56±1.66 years, mass = 64.85±5.76 kg, height = 165.94±2.84 cm; n = 18), or a control (CON) group (age = 21.27±0.68 years, mass = 68.43±4.86 kg, height = 168.63±2.84 cm; n = 15). The training groups participated in an 8-week supervised single- or multi-joint lower limb training consisting of 18 sessions. Pre- and post-training, six repetitions maximum (RM) and maximal voluntary isometric contraction in the three exercises were assessed, along with electromyography of the superficial quadriceps muscles. Improvements in all dynamic exercises were greatest after training the specific exercises (ES = 1.26-2.14, P<0.001-0.025) and all were greater in the training groups than in the CON group (ES = 1.43-3.31, P<0.001-0.021). The SJ group improved 6RM in leg extension and kickback more than leg press (ES = 1.51 and 2.04, respectively, P<0.001), whereas the MJ group improved leg press 6RM more than kickback (ES = 1.10, P = 0.002). However, leg press and leg extension strength improved similarly in the MJ group (ES = 0.54, P = 0.072). All strength and electromyographic measures remained unchanged in the CON group (ES = 0.00-0.44, P = 0.412-0.966). Improved dynamic strength in leg press, kickback and leg extension is best attained by training the specific exercises, but both training modalities can improve strength across all exercises.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Electromyographic Comparison of Five Lower-Limb Muscles between Single- and Multi-Joint Exercises among Trained Men.J Sports Sci Med. 2021 Mar 1;20(1):56-61. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2021.56. eCollection 2021 Mar. J Sports Sci Med. 2021. PMID: 33707987 Free PMC article.
-
Resistance Training with Single vs. Multi-joint Exercises at Equal Total Load Volume: Effects on Body Composition, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Muscle Strength.Front Physiol. 2017 Dec 22;8:1105. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.01105. eCollection 2017. Front Physiol. 2017. PMID: 29312007 Free PMC article.
-
Muscular performance and body composition changes following multi-joint versus combined multi- and single-joint exercises in aging adults.Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018 Jun;43(6):602-608. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0655. Epub 2018 Jan 19. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018. PMID: 29351383 Clinical Trial.
-
A Review of the Acute Effects and Long-Term Adaptations of Single- and Multi-Joint Exercises during Resistance Training.Sports Med. 2017 May;47(5):843-855. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0627-5. Sports Med. 2017. PMID: 27677913 Review.
-
The Effect of Weekly Set Volume on Strength Gain: A Meta-Analysis.Sports Med. 2017 Dec;47(12):2585-2601. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0762-7. Sports Med. 2017. PMID: 28755103 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Different time course recovery of muscle edema within the quadriceps femoris and functional performance after single- vs multi-joint exercises.Biol Sport. 2023 Jul;40(3):767-774. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2023.119984. Epub 2022 Nov 18. Biol Sport. 2023. PMID: 37398959 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Different Isokinetic Movement Patterns on Shoulder Rehabilitation Outcome.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 25;19(17):10623. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710623. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36078339 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Effect of Grip Width on Muscle Strength and Electromyographic Activity in Bench Press among Novice- and Resistance-Trained Men.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 14;18(12):6444. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126444. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34198674 Free PMC article.
-
Minimalist Training: Is Lower Dosage or Intensity Resistance Training Effective to Improve Physical Fitness? A Narrative Review.Sports Med. 2024 Feb;54(2):289-302. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01949-3. Epub 2023 Nov 4. Sports Med. 2024. PMID: 37924459 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Muscle strength gains per week are higher in the lower-body than the upper-body in resistance training experienced healthy young women-A systematic review with meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0284216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284216. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37053143 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wernbom M, Augustsson J, Thomee R. The influence of frequency, intensity, volume and mode of strength training on whole muscle cross-sectional area in humans. Sports Med. 2007;37(3):225–64. - PubMed
-
- Sale D, MacDougall D. Specificity in strength training: a review for the coach and athlete. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1981;6(2):87–92. - PubMed
-
- Behm DG, Sale DG. Velocity specificity of resistance training. Sports Med. 1993;15(6):374–88. - PubMed
-
- Appleby BB, Cormack SJ, Newton RU. Specificity and Transfer of Lower-Body Strength: Influence of Bilateral or Unilateral Lower-Body Resistance Training. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33(2):318–26. - PubMed
-
- ACSM. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(3):687–708. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources