Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 May 27;12(6):1378.
doi: 10.3390/cancers12061378.

PARP Inhibitors in the Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: The Step Beyond?

Affiliations
Review

PARP Inhibitors in the Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: The Step Beyond?

Anthony Gonçalves et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Exquisitely exploiting defects in homologous recombination process, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have recently emerged as a promising class of therapeutics in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer with germline breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) or breast cancer 2 (BRCA2) mutations (gBRCA1/2m). In this setting, PARP inhibitors, either as single agent or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, significantly increased progression-free survival, as compared to conventional chemotherapy. Accordingly, further therapeutic advances are expected at an earlier stage of the disease. In the neoadjuvant setting, veliparib failed to increase the pathological complete response rate when added to a carboplatin-based regimen, in unselected triple-negative breast cancer patients. Similarly, when administered before anthracycline-cyclophosphamide, the neoadjuvant olaparib-paclitaxel combination was not superior to carboplatin-paclitaxel, in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer and BRCA1/2 mutation, or homologous recombination defect. Yet, neoadjuvant talazoparib, administered as a single-agent in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutation, achieved an impressive pathological complete response rate of nearly 50%. In the adjuvant setting, the results from the OlympiA phase III study, evaluating adjuvant olaparib in HER2-negative early breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutations, are eagerly awaited. Ongoing trials should clarify whether PARP inhibitors might improve outcome when administered in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting in early breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutation or homologous recombination defect.

Keywords: BRCA; PARP inhibitors; early breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.G. reports travel expenses, accommodation, and meeting registration from Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Roche, and Novartis. A.B. and F.B. declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adaptive Randomization of the Veliparib-Carboplatin Treatment in Breast Cancer (I-SPY2). Weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 for 12 doses ± veliparib 50 mg twice a day (BID), and carboplatin AUC 6 on weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10, followed by doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (AC) IV, every 2 to 3 weeks for 4 doses. HER2—human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; TNBC—triple negative breast cancer; HR—hormone receptor; pCR—pathological complete response; AUC—area under the curve; RCB—residual cancer burden; MP—MammaPrint; VC—Veliparib/Carboplatin; and AC—doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Neoadjuvant Talazoparib for Patients with Operable Breast Cancer With a Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variant. HER2—human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR—hormone receptor; pCR—pathological complete response; gBRCA mutation—germline breast cancer 1 or breast cancer 2 mutation; and RCB—residual cancer burden.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Design of the OlympiA adjuvant study. HER2—human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; TNBC—triple negative breast cancer; ECOG—Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HR—hormone receptor; germline BRCA1/2 mutation—germline breast cancer 1 or breast cancer 2 mutation; pCR—pathological complete response; NACT—neoadjuvant chemotherapy; ACT—adjuvant chemotherapy; S—surgery; RT—radiotherapy; iDFS—invasive disease-free survival; OS—overall survival; DMFS—distant metastasis-free survival; and PROS—patient-reported outcomes.

References

    1. Peto J., Collins N., Barfoot R., Seal S., Warren W., Rahman N., Easton D.F., Evans C., Deacon J., Stratton M.R., et al. Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations in patients with early-onset breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1999;91:943–949. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.11.943. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Begg C.B., Haile R.W., Borg A., Malone K.E., Concannon P., Thomas D.C., Langholz B., Bernstein L., Olsen J.H., Lynch C.F., et al. Variation of breast cancer risk among BRCA1/2 carriers. JAMA. 2008;299:194–201. doi: 10.1001/jama.2007.55-a. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuchenbaecker K.B., Hopper J.L., Barnes D.R., Phillips K.-A., Mooij T.M., Roos-Blom M.-J., Jervis S., van Leeuwen F.E., Milne R.L., Andrieu N., et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA. 2017;317:2402–2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7112. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gudmundsdottir K., Ashworth A. The roles of BRCA1 and BRCA2 and associated proteins in the maintenance of genomic stability. Oncogene. 2006;25:5864–5874. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209874. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Foulkes W.D., Stefansson I.M., Chappuis P.O., Begin L.R., Goffin J.R., Wong N., Trudel M., Akslen L.A. Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1482–1485. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djg050. - DOI - PubMed