Estimating utility value for female genital mutilation
- PMID: 32471405
- PMCID: PMC7260824
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08947-4
Estimating utility value for female genital mutilation
Abstract
Background: Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is a clear violation of women's rights and can have adverse and irreversible health effects as well. Worldwide, more than 200 million women and girls have undergone FGM/C. Utility value of FGM/C has not been estimated yet, so we designed this study to extract the health utility value of FGM/C for the first time in the world.
Methods: In a cross-sectional study in Iran, 125 girls and women who underwent FGM/C procedure were examined by the trained midwives in order to determine its type. In addition, a questionnaire was completed for identifying the socio-demographic factors and extracting the health utility of these individuals. Health utility was measured using Time Trade-off method and also to determine the effects of the socio-demographic factors on the health utility a two-limit censored regression model was applied.
Results: The mean and median of the health utility of women with FGM/C were 0.971 (SE: 0.003) and 0.968 (IQR: 1-0.95), respectively. Number of non-traders was 58 (46.4%) who reported perfect health utility. However, the mean of health utility among traders was 0.946 (SE: 0.002). Only type 1 (Clitoridectomy) and type 2 (Excision) FGM/C were seen in this study. Women with Type 1 FGM/C had significantly lower health utility value (Mean: 0.968, Median: 0.957) than their type 2 counterparts (Mean: 0.987, Median: 1.00). Moreover, women in the age group of 31-45 years (Mean: 0.962, Median: 0.956), single (Mean: 0.950, Median: 0.954), divorced (Mean: 0.951, Median: 0.950), employed (Mean: 0.959, Median: 0.956), and with supplementary insurance (Mean: 0.962, Median: 0.950) had significantly lower health utility than their counterparts.
Conclusion: FGM/C affects physical and psychological well-being of these individuals, resulting in a lack of personal and marital satisfaction, which ultimately leads to a 3% reduction in their health related quality of life. Therefore, preventing from this practice is very important and should be considered by health system policy makers more than before.
Keywords: Circumcision; DALY; Disease utility; Female genital mutilation; Women’s health.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Combating female genital mutilation: an agenda for the next decade.World Health Stat Q. 1996;49(2):142-7. World Health Stat Q. 1996. PMID: 9050193
-
Post-traumatic stress disorder among Iranian women with genital mutilation: a cross-sectional study.Reprod Health. 2023 Apr 12;20(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01561-0. Reprod Health. 2023. PMID: 37046320 Free PMC article.
-
Epidemiology, Regional Characteristics, Knowledge, and Attitude Toward Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in Southern Iran.J Sex Med. 2015 Jul;12(7):1577-83. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12938. Epub 2015 Jul 2. J Sex Med. 2015. PMID: 26139452
-
Towards a better estimation of prevalence of female genital mutilation in the European Union: a situation analysis.Reprod Health. 2020 Jul 8;17(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00947-2. Reprod Health. 2020. PMID: 32641062 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Gender equality and human rights approaches to female genital mutilation: a review of international human rights norms and standards.Reprod Health. 2017 May 12;14(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0322-5. Reprod Health. 2017. PMID: 28499386 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
"You must cut that long and stinking thing": uncovering the lived experiences of uncircumcised pokot women in North-Eastern Uganda.BMC Womens Health. 2022 Nov 4;22(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02005-4. BMC Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 36333698 Free PMC article.
-
The comparison of sexual function in types I and II of female genital mutilation.BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jan 8;24(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02860-9. BMC Womens Health. 2024. PMID: 38191359 Free PMC article.
-
What Makes the Time Tradeoff Tick? A Sociopsychological Explanation.Med Decis Making. 2024 Nov;44(8):974-985. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241286477. Epub 2024 Oct 15. Med Decis Making. 2024. PMID: 39403849 Free PMC article.
-
Somalian women with female genital mutilation had increased risk of female sexual dysfunction: a cross-sectional observational study.Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 17;12(1):15633. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19949-0. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36115897 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Organization WH. WHO guidelines on the management of health complications from female genital mutilation: policy brief. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. - PubMed
-
- Unicef. Female Genital Mutilation/cutting: a Global Concern. UNICEF's Data Work on FGM/C: Unicef; 2016. https://www.unicef.org/media/files/FGMC_2016_brochure_final_UNICEF_SPREA....
-
- Ahmed Magdy R., Shaaban Mohamed M., Meky Heba K., Amin Arafa Mohamed E., Mohamed Tamer Y., Gharib Waleed F., Ahmed Abeer B. Psychological impact of female genital mutilation among adolescent Egyptian girls: a cross-sectional study. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 2017;22(4):280–285. - PubMed
-
- United Nations Children's Fund, Gupta GR. Female genital mutilation/cutting: a statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. Reproductive Health Matters. 2013. pp.184-190. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43288321?seq=1.
-
- Van Baelen L, Ortensi L, EJTEJoC L, Care RH. Estimates of first-generation women and girls with female genital mutilation in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(6):474–82. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources