Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;96(8):571-581.
doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2019-054309. Epub 2020 May 29.

How to increase chlamydia testing in primary care: a qualitative exploration with young people and application of a meta-theoretical model

Affiliations

How to increase chlamydia testing in primary care: a qualitative exploration with young people and application of a meta-theoretical model

Lorraine K McDonagh et al. Sex Transm Infect. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to explore young people's perspectives barriers to chlamydia testing in general practice and potential intervention functions and implementation strategies to overcome identified barriers, using a meta-theoretical framework (the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW)).

Methods: Twenty-eight semistructured individual interviews were conducted with 16-24 year olds from across the UK. Purposive and convenience sampling methods were used (eg, youth organisations, charities, online platforms and chain-referrals). An inductive thematic analysis was first conducted, followed by thematic categorisation using the BCW.

Results: Participants identified several barriers to testing: conducting self-sampling inaccurately (physical capability); lack of information and awareness (psychological capability); testing not seen as a priority and perceived low risk (reflective motivation); embarrassment, fear and guilt (automatic motivation); the UK primary care context and location of toilets (physical opportunity) and stigma (social opportunity). Potential intervention functions raised by participants included education (eg, increase awareness of chlamydia); persuasion (eg, use of imagery/data to alter beliefs); environmental restructuring (eg, alternative sampling methods) and modelling (eg, credible sources such as celebrities). Potential implementation strategies and policy categories discussed were communication and marketing (eg, social media); service provision (eg, introduction of a young person's health-check) and guidelines (eg, standard questions for healthcare providers).

Conclusions: The BCW provided a useful framework for conceptually exploring the wide range of barriers to testing identified and possible intervention functions and policy categories to overcome said barriers. While greater education and awareness and expanded opportunities for testing were considered important, this alone will not bring about dramatic increases in testing. A societal and structural shift towards the normalisation of chlamydia testing is needed, alongside approaches which recognise the heterogeneity of this population. To ensure optimal and inclusive healthcare, researchers, clinicians and policy makers alike must consider patient diversity and the wider health issues affecting all young people.

Keywords: adolescent; behavioural science; chlamydia infection; general practice; qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Behaviour Change Wheel (Michie et al 10). COM-B, Capability, Opportunity and Motivation Model of Behaviour.

References

    1. Public Health England Sexually transmitted infections and Chlamydia screening in England, 2018, 2019. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa...
    1. England PH. Information to support the commissioning of Chlamydia screening in general practice and community pharmacies. National Chlamydia screening programme. London: PHE, 2014. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa...
    1. Salisbury C, Macleod J, Egger M, et al. Opportunistic and systematic screening for Chlamydia: a study of consultations by young adults in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2006;56:99–103. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hogan AH, Howell-Jones RS, Pottinger E, et al. "…they should be offering it": a qualitative study to investigate young peoples' attitudes towards chlamydia screening in GP surgeries. BMC Public Health 2010;10:616. 10.1186/1471-2458-10-616 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McDonagh LK, Saunders JM, Cassell J, et al. Application of the COM-B model to barriers and facilitators to Chlamydia testing in general practice for young people and primary care practitioners: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2018;13:130. 10.1186/s13012-018-0821-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types