Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 1;43(5):851-854.
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002858. Epub 2020 May 28.

Total Filling of the Vitreous Cavity With a Cohesive Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Device to Support the Removal of the Intraocular Foreign Body

Affiliations

Total Filling of the Vitreous Cavity With a Cohesive Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Device to Support the Removal of the Intraocular Foreign Body

Małgorzata Rogaczewska et al. Retina. .

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of loading the vitreous cavity with a cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device in aiding the removal of the posterior segment intraocular foreign body (IOFB).

Methods: Seven consecutive patients underwent a small-gauge vitrectomy due to eye trauma with the IOFB between January 2019 and December 2019. The IOFB removal was initiated after total filling the vitreous cavity with the ophthalmic viscosurgical device (Eyefill C or Bio-Hyalur Plus) to facilitate maneuvering and slow the descent in cases of the unintendedly released IOFBs. The eye examination was performed at presentation and at 1 day, 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. The best-corrected visual acuity and intraocular pressure were evaluated.

Results: In all eyes, IOFBs were elevated into the center of the vitreous cavity and could be securely gripped while suspended in the ophthalmic viscosurgical device to allow the surgeon for successful and harmless removal. In the 3-month follow-up, the best-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in 5 patients and 20/25 in 2 patients. In the early postoperative period, the elevation of intraocular pressure did not occur. No patient developed endophthalmitis.

Conclusion: The authors demonstrated that this uncomplicated technique is an effective surgical option for more reliable removal of posterior segment IOFBs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Reply.
    Stopa M, Rogaczewska M. Stopa M, et al. Retina. 2023 Nov 1;43(11):e63. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003894. Retina. 2023. PMID: 37450778 No abstract available.

References

    1. Guevara-Villarreal DA, Rodríguez-Valdés PJ. Posterior segment intraocular foreign body: extraction surgical techniques, timing, and indications for vitrectomy. J Ophthalmol 2016;2016:2034509.
    1. Loporchio D, Mukkamala L, Gorukanti K, et al. Intraocular foreign bodies: a review. Surv Ophthalmol 2016;61:582–596.
    1. Shah CM, Gentile RC, Mehta MC. Perfluorocarbon liquids' ability to protect the macula from intraocular dropping of metallic foreign bodies: a model eye study. Retina 2016;36:1285–1291.
    1. Ung C, Laíns I, Papakostas TD, et al. Perfluorocarbon liquid-assisted intraocular foreign body removal. Clin Ophthalmol 2018;12:1099–1104.
    1. Rejdak R, Choragiewicz T, Moneta-Wielgos J, et al. Intraoperative macula protection by perfluorocarbon liquid for the metallic intraocular foreign body removal during 23-gauge vitrectomy. J Ophthalmol 2017;2017:6232151.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources