Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;47(9):4509-4521.
doi: 10.1002/mp.14299. Epub 2020 Jun 25.

A Monte Carlo-based analytic model of neutron dose equivalent for a mevion gantry-mounted passively scattered proton system for craniospinal irradiation

Affiliations

A Monte Carlo-based analytic model of neutron dose equivalent for a mevion gantry-mounted passively scattered proton system for craniospinal irradiation

Milad Baradaran-Ghahfarokhi et al. Med Phys. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To calculate in- and out-of-field neutron spectra and dose equivalent, using Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, for a Mevion gantry-mounted passively scattered proton system in craniospinal irradiation. An analytical model based on the MC calculations that estimates in- and out-of-field neutron dose equivalent from proton Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) was also developed.

Methods: The MCNPX MC code was used to simulate a Mevion S250 proton therapy system. The simulated proton depth doses and profiles for pristine and spread-out Bragg peaks were benchmarked against the measured data. Previous measurements using extended-range Bonner spheres were used to verify the calculated neutron spectra and dose equivalent. Using the benchmarked results as a reference condition, a correction-based analytical model was reconstructed by fitting the data to derive model parameters at 95% confidence interval. Sensitivity analysis of brass aperture opening, thickness of the Lucite (PMMA) range compensator, and modulation width was performed to obtain correction parameters for nonreference conditions.

Results: For the neutron dose equivalent per therapeutic proton dose, the MCNPX calculated dose equivalent matched the measured values to within 8%. The benchmarked neutron dose equivalent at the isocenter was 41.2 and 20.8 mSv/Gy, for cranial and spinal fields, respectively. For in- and out-of-field neutron dose calculations, the correction-based analytical model showed up to 17% discrepancy compared to the MC calculations. The correction factors may provide a conservative estimation of neutron dose, especially for depth ≤ 5 cm and regions underneath the brass aperture.

Conclusion: The proposed analytical model can be used to estimate the contribution of the neutron dose to the overall CSI treatment dose. Moreover, the model can be employed to estimate the neutron dose to the implantable cardiac electronic devices.

Keywords: MCNP; analytic model; craniospinal irradiation; neutron dose equivalent; passively scattered proton.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Newhauser WD, Zhang R. The physics of proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:R155-R209.
    1. Zhao T, Sun B, Grantham K, et al. Commissioning and initial experience with the first clinical gantry-mounted proton therapy system. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17:24-40.
    1. Chen KL, Bloch CD, Hill PM, Klein EE. Evaluation of neutron dose equivalent from the Mevion S250 proton accelerator: measurements and calculations. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58:8709-8723.
    1. Kry SF, Salehpour M, Followill DS, et al. Out-of-field photon and neutron dose equivalents from step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:1204-1216.
    1. Taddei PJ, Mahajan A, Mirkovic D, et al. Predicted risks of second malignant neoplasm incidence and mortality due to secondary neutrons in a girl and boy receiving proton craniospinal irradiation. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:7067-7080.

LinkOut - more resources