Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug;13(4):520-524.
doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09650-y.

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Current Concepts

Affiliations
Review

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Current Concepts

Michael N Nakashian et al. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Compressive neuropathy of the ulnar nerve across the elbow is a common diagnosis encountered frequently within a hand and upper extremity clinical practice. Appropriate and timely evaluation, diagnosis, objective testing, and evidence-based decisions regarding treatment options are paramount in the optimal care of the patient with this pathology. An understanding of current literature is critical in determining and understanding best practices.

Recent findings: A thorough review of the recent literature regarding physical examination, diagnostic testing, and nonoperative versus operative results was performed. Regarding physical examination, the glenohumeral internal rotation test and scratch collapse test are more effective and sensitive than traditional maneuvers such as Tinel's testing and the elbow flexion test. Electrodiagnostic testing, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound evaluation have all been shown to be effective in diagnosing cubital tunnel syndrome. However, no single test has proven itself to be superior. Nonoperative treatment can be successful for mild cases of cubital tunnel syndrome. Surgical release techniques comparing open with endoscopic release are equivocal, and in situ release versus transposition techniques show that transposition should not be performed routinely. The diagnosis and treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome do not have a well-defined algorithm based on current literature. The treating physician must therefore utilize the available information to determine a diagnostic and treatment plan individualized to the patient. More rigorous scientific studies are needed to determine the most effective surgical approaches for cubital tunnel syndrome.

Keywords: Cubital tunnel release; Cubital tunnel syndrome; In situ decompression; Ulnar nerve compression; Ulnar nerve transposition; Ulnar neuropathy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Michael N. Nakashian declares that he has no conflict of interest. Danielle Ireland declares that she has no conflict of interest. Patrick Kane declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Caliandro P, La Torre G, Padua R, Giannini F, Padua L. Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012:CD006839. - PubMed
    1. Staples JR, Calfee R. Cubital tunnel syndrome: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25:e215–ee24. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00261. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ochi K, Horiuchi Y, Tanabe A, Waseda M, Kaneko Y, Koyanagi T. Shoulder internal rotation elbow flexion test for diagnosing cubital tunnel syndrome. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2012;21:777–781. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.10.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheng CJ, Mackinnon-Patterson B, Beck JL, Mackinnon SE. Scratch collapse test for evaluation of carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:1518–1524. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.05.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dy CJ, Mackinnon SE. Ulnar neuropathy: evaluation and management. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016;9:178–184. doi: 10.1007/s12178-016-9327-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed