Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 May 14;26(18):2166-2176.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i18.2166.

Hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation: An old tale or a clear and present danger?

Affiliations
Review

Hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation: An old tale or a clear and present danger?

Ilaria Lenci et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) has been described more than 50 years ago. Similarly, to other clinical conditions, in which impairment of host immune defense favors viral replication, early reports described in details recurrence and reactivation of HBV in liver transplant recipients. The evidence of a possible, severe, clinical evolution of HBV reappearance in a significant percentage of these patients, allowed to consider, for some years, HBV positivity a contraindication for LT. Moving from the old to the new millennium this picture has changed dramatically. Several studies contributed to establish efficient prophylactic protocols for HBV recurrence and with the advent of more potent anti-viral drugs an increased control of infection was achieved in transplanted patients as well as in the general immune-competent HBV population. Success obtained in the last decade led some authors to the conclusion that HBV is now to consider just as a "mere nuisance". However, with regard to HBV and LT, outstanding issues are still on the table: (1) A standard HBV prophylaxis protocol after transplant has not yet been clearly defined; (2) The evidence of HBV resistant strains to the most potent antiviral agents is claiming for a new generation of drugs; and (3) The possibility of prophylaxis withdrawal in some patients has been demonstrated, but reliable methods for their selection are still lacking. The evolution of LT for HBV is examined in detail in this review together with the description of the strategies adopted to prevent HBV recurrence and their pros and cons.

Keywords: Antiviral drug; Hepatitis B virus; Liver transplant; Minimization; Prophylaxis; Viral recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: No conflict of interest to disclose.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Liang TJ. Hepatitis B: the virus and disease. Hepatology. 2009;49:S13–S21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang FS, Fan JG, Zhang Z, Gao B, Wang HY. The global burden of liver disease: the major impact of China. Hepatology. 2014;60:2099–2108. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin CL, Kao JH. Natural history of acute and chronic hepatitis B: The role of HBV genotypes and mutants. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;31:249–255. - PubMed
    1. Fattovich G. Natural history of hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2003;39 Suppl 1:S50–S58. - PubMed
    1. Terrault NA, Bzowej NH, Chang KM, Hwang JP, Jonas MM, Murad MH American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. AASLD guidelines for treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2016;63:261–283. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms