Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 May 12:14:431.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00431. eCollection 2020.

Neurorestoration Approach by Biomaterials in Ischemic Stroke

Affiliations
Review

Neurorestoration Approach by Biomaterials in Ischemic Stroke

Noelia Esteban-Garcia et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

Ischemic stroke (IS) is the leading cause of disability in the western world, assuming a high socio-economic cost. One of the most used strategies in the last decade has been biomaterials, which have been initially used with a structural support function. They have been perfected, different compounds have been combined, and they have been used together with cell therapy or controlled release chemical compounds. This double function has driven them as potential candidates for the chronic treatment of IS. In fact, the most developed are in different phases of clinical trial. In this review, we will show the ischemic scenario and address the most important criteria to achieve a successful neuroreparation from the point of view of biomaterials. The spontaneous processes that are activated and how to enhance them is one of the keys that contribute to the success of the therapeutic approach. In addition, the different routes of administration and how they affect the design of biomaterials are analyzed. Future perspectives show where this broad scientific field is heading, which advances every day with the help of technology and advanced therapies.

Keywords: biomaterials; cell therapy; neurorestoration; repair; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arai K., Jin G., Navaratna D., Lo E. H. (2009). Brain angiogenesis in developmental and pathological processes: neurovascular injury and angiogenic recovery after stroke. FEBS J. 276 4644–4652. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07176.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arvidsson A., Collin T., Kirik D., Kokaia Z., Lindvall O. (2002). Neuronal replacement from endogenous precursors in the adult brain after stroke. Nat. Med. 8:963. 10.1038/nm747 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arvidsson A., Kokaia Z., Lindvall O. (2001). N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor- mediated increase of neurogenesis in adult rat dentate gyrus following stroke. Eur. J. Neurosci. 14 10–18. 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01611.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baeten K. M., Akassoglou K. (2011). Extracellular matrix and matrix receptors in blood-brain barrier formation and stroke. Dev. Neurobiol. 71 1018–1039. 10.1002/dneu.20954 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bagley J. A., Belluscio L. (2010). Dynamic imaging reveals that brain-derived neurotrophic factor can independently regulate motility and direction of neuroblasts within the rostral migratory stream. Neuroscience 1 1449–1461. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.05.075 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources