Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 14:11:480.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00480. eCollection 2020.

The Validity of the Session Rating of Perceived Exertion Method for Measuring Internal Training Load in Professional Classical Ballet Dancers

Affiliations

The Validity of the Session Rating of Perceived Exertion Method for Measuring Internal Training Load in Professional Classical Ballet Dancers

Joseph W Shaw et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the convergent validity of session rating of perceived exertion (s-RPE) with objective measures of internal training load (TL) in professional classical ballet dancers. Heart rate and s-RPE data were collected in 22 professional classical ballet dancers across a total of 218 ballet class or rehearsal sessions. Eleven participants completed at least 9 sessions, and were therefore included in analyses of individual relationships between s-RPE and objective measures. To calculate s-RPE, the session duration was multiplied by the RPE, measured using the modified Borg CR-10 scale. The Edwards summated heart rate zones (Edwards TRIMP) and Banister training impulse (Banister TRIMP) methods were used as criterion measures of internal TL. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were used to determine intra-individual relationships between s-RPE and objective measures. Repeated measures correlations were used to identify intra-individual relationships common across the cohort. Positive linear relationships were seen between s-RPE and objective measures across all session types [Edwards TRIMP: r rm (195) = 0.81, p < 0.001; Banister TRIMP: r rm (195) = 0.79, p < 0.001], in ballet class [Edwards TRIMP: r rm (58) = 0.64, p < 0.001; Banister TRIMP: r rm (58) = 0.59, p < 0.001], and in rehearsals [Edwards TRIMP: r rm (119) = 0.82, p < 0.001; Banister TRIMP: r rm (119) = 0.80, p < 0.001], as well as across both males [Edwards TRIMP: r rm (136) = 0.82, p < 0.001; Banister TRIMP: r rm (136) = 0.80, p < 0.001], and females [Edwards TRIMP: r rm (57) = 0.80, p < 0.001; Banister TRIMP: r rm (57) = 0.78, p < 0.001]. Intra-individual correlation coefficients ranged from 0.46-0.96 [Edwards TRIMP: mean r = 0.81 ± 0.11, p = 0.051 - < 0.001; Banister TRIMP: mean r = 0.78 ± 0.14, p = 0.13- < 0.001]. These results demonstrate that s-RPE is a valid and practical method for measuring internal TL in professional classical ballet dancers.

Keywords: RPE; athlete monitoring; athlete wellness; ballet; dance; training load.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The distribution of (A) session rating of perceived exertion (Session RPE); (B) Edwards summated heart rate zones (Edwards TRIMP); and (C) Banister training impulse (Banister TRIMP) measures during all sessions (red bars), ballet class (solid line), and rehearsals (dashed line).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
A comparison of Pearson’s correlation and repeated measures correlation (rmcorr) results for relationships between session rating of perceived exertion (session-RPE) and (A) Edwards summated heart rate zones method (Edwards TRIMP), and (B) Banister training impulse (Banister TRIMP). Each session completed by a participant is represented by a black circle. Blue lines depict individual Pearson’s correlations for each participant. Red lines depict the goodness of the rmcorr fit for each participant. Correlation coefficients, p values, and 95% confidence intervals for each participant who completed at least 9 sessions can be found in Table 1.

References

    1. Alderson J. A., Hopper L. S., Elliott B. C., Ackland T. (2009). Risk factors for lower back injury in male dancers performing ballet lifts. J. Dance Med. Sci. 13 83–89. - PubMed
    1. Allen N., Nevill A., Brooks J., Koutedakis Y., Wyon M. (2012). Ballet injuries: injury incidence and severity over 1 year. J. Orthopaedic Sports Phys. Ther. 42 781–790. 10.2519/jospt.2012.3893 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakdash J. Z., Marusich L. R. (2017). Repeated measures correlation. Front. Psychol. 8:456 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00456 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banister E. (1991). “Modeling elite athletic performance,” in Modeling Elite Athletic Performance, eds Green H., McDougal J., Wenger H. (Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; ), 403–424.
    1. Barnes K. R. (2017). Comparisons of perceived training doses in champion collegiate-level male and female cross-country runners and coaches over the course of a competitive season. Sports Med. Open 3 1–9. 10.1186/s40798-017-0105-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed