Factors that influenced pregnant women with one previous caesarean section regarding their mode of delivery
- PMID: 32477510
- PMCID: PMC7251298
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.05.007
Factors that influenced pregnant women with one previous caesarean section regarding their mode of delivery
Abstract
Background: During the last decades, the rate of caesarean section is increasing and this can increase the mortality and morbidity. Up to one third of the caesarean sections are attributed to the elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS). This study aims to evaluate attitudes and factors affecting the choice of pregnant women with one previous caesarean section regarding their mode of delivery in their second pregnancy. By assessing these attitudes, this study can help the efforts in developing strategies to increase the rates of vaginal delivery.
Material and methods: A cross-sectional design was conducted by a structured questionnaire on 166 pregnant women who had delivered once by caesarean section for their first pregnancy and were in the third trimester of their second pregnancy. Any women with an absolute indication for caesarean section was excluded. The study comprises women who attend the clinic at our center in Northern of Jordan. Proper statistical tests were performed to assess the association between the choice of delivery and selected demographic and clinical factors.
Results: About 55.4% responded that they would choose ERCS (n = 92) and the remaining participants chose trial of labour after caesarean section (TOLAC) (n = 74). Fear of pain was the most common reason for choosing caesarean section, accounting for 55.4%. Interestingly, our study did not show a significant association between the mode of delivery and demographic factors, such as age, educational level and occupation. The single independent significant factor influencing patients' choice that our study revealed was "being informed about the complications of TOLAC". The choice of TOLAC was almost four times higher for those participants who had been informed about the complications, compared to those who had not been informed.
Conclusion: Proper counselling is a main factor that affected the patients' choice toward the mode of delivery. Proper pain management may encourage patients to choose TOLAC because fear of pain was a main reason that patients requested ERCS instead of TOLAC.
Keywords: Caesarean section; ERCS; TOLAC; VBAC; Vaginal delivery.
© 2020 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Are There Differences between Women who Choose Elective Repeat Caesarean Versus Trial of Labour in St. John's, NL?J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Jul;40(7):903-909. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.10.021. Epub 2018 Apr 27. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018. PMID: 29709454
-
Trial of labour or elective repeat caesarean delivery:are women making an informed decision at Kenyatta national hospital?BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 15;17(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1440-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017. PMID: 28810843 Free PMC article.
-
VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER A PREVIOUS CAESAREAN SECTION: CURRENT TRENDS AND OUTLOOK IN GHANA.J West Afr Coll Surg. 2014 Apr-Jun;4(2):1-25. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2014. PMID: 26587520 Free PMC article.
-
Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013. PMID: 23810846 Review.
-
Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Current status and where to from here?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 May;224:52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Mar 7. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018. PMID: 29547806 Review.
Cited by
-
Feeding Practices, Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Vaginal Birth after Cesarean and Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;19(13):7696. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137696. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35805350 Free PMC article.
-
Construction of a prediction model and a prevention control system for cesarean section rate based on the Robson classification system.Am J Transl Res. 2021 Apr 15;13(4):3238-3245. eCollection 2021. Am J Transl Res. 2021. PMID: 34017494 Free PMC article.
-
Identifies Current Trends in Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section in IRAN: A Qualitative Study.Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2024 Jul 2;29(3):330-336. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_359_22. eCollection 2024 May-Jun. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2024. PMID: 39100408 Free PMC article.
-
Pro-lactation cesarean section: Immediate skin-to-skin contact and its influence on prolonged breastfeeding.Front Sociol. 2022 Sep 27;7:908811. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.908811. eCollection 2022. Front Sociol. 2022. PMID: 36237277 Free PMC article.
-
How two-child policy affects cesarean section in women with advanced maternal age (AMA): using the Robson classification system.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Oct 3;24(1):641. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06784-6. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 39363249 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organisation Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2(8452):436–437. - PubMed
-
- Betran A.P., Merialdi M., Lauer J.A. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2007;21(2):98–113. - PubMed
-
- Leone T., Padmadas S.S., Matthews Z. Community factors affecting rising caesarean section rates in developing countries: an analysis of six countries. Soc. Sci. Med. 2008;67(8):1236–1246. - PubMed
-
- O'Leary C.M., de Klerk N., Keogh J. Trends in mode of delivery during 1984-2003: can they be explained by pregnancy and delivery complications? BJOG. 2007;114(7):855–864. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources