Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 18:55:124-130.
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.05.007. eCollection 2020 Jul.

Factors that influenced pregnant women with one previous caesarean section regarding their mode of delivery

Affiliations

Factors that influenced pregnant women with one previous caesarean section regarding their mode of delivery

Amer Sindiani et al. Ann Med Surg (Lond). .

Abstract

Background: During the last decades, the rate of caesarean section is increasing and this can increase the mortality and morbidity. Up to one third of the caesarean sections are attributed to the elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS). This study aims to evaluate attitudes and factors affecting the choice of pregnant women with one previous caesarean section regarding their mode of delivery in their second pregnancy. By assessing these attitudes, this study can help the efforts in developing strategies to increase the rates of vaginal delivery.

Material and methods: A cross-sectional design was conducted by a structured questionnaire on 166 pregnant women who had delivered once by caesarean section for their first pregnancy and were in the third trimester of their second pregnancy. Any women with an absolute indication for caesarean section was excluded. The study comprises women who attend the clinic at our center in Northern of Jordan. Proper statistical tests were performed to assess the association between the choice of delivery and selected demographic and clinical factors.

Results: About 55.4% responded that they would choose ERCS (n = 92) and the remaining participants chose trial of labour after caesarean section (TOLAC) (n = 74). Fear of pain was the most common reason for choosing caesarean section, accounting for 55.4%. Interestingly, our study did not show a significant association between the mode of delivery and demographic factors, such as age, educational level and occupation. The single independent significant factor influencing patients' choice that our study revealed was "being informed about the complications of TOLAC". The choice of TOLAC was almost four times higher for those participants who had been informed about the complications, compared to those who had not been informed.

Conclusion: Proper counselling is a main factor that affected the patients' choice toward the mode of delivery. Proper pain management may encourage patients to choose TOLAC because fear of pain was a main reason that patients requested ERCS instead of TOLAC.

Keywords: Caesarean section; ERCS; TOLAC; VBAC; Vaginal delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Attitudes towards choosing ERCS (N = 92).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Attitudes towards choosing TOLAC (N = 74).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organisation Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2(8452):436–437. - PubMed
    1. Betran A.P., Merialdi M., Lauer J.A. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2007;21(2):98–113. - PubMed
    1. Feng X.L., Xu L., Guo Y., Ronsmans C. Factors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008. Bull. World Health Organ. 2012;90(1):30–39. 39a. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leone T., Padmadas S.S., Matthews Z. Community factors affecting rising caesarean section rates in developing countries: an analysis of six countries. Soc. Sci. Med. 2008;67(8):1236–1246. - PubMed
    1. O'Leary C.M., de Klerk N., Keogh J. Trends in mode of delivery during 1984-2003: can they be explained by pregnancy and delivery complications? BJOG. 2007;114(7):855–864. - PubMed