Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun;69(6):781-791.
doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001206. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

Emerging tick-borne pathogens of public health importance: a mini-review

Affiliations
Review

Emerging tick-borne pathogens of public health importance: a mini-review

Ilia Rochlin et al. J Med Microbiol. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Ticks are the most important vectors of human pathogens, leading to increased public health burdens worldwide. Tick-borne pathogens include viruses (e.g. tick-borne encephalitis and Powassan); bacteria, such as the causative agents of Lyme disease, spotted fever rickettsiosis and human anaplasmosis; and malaria-like protozoan parasites causing babesiosis. Tick-borne diseases are emerging due to the geographical expansion of their tick vectors, especially in the northern hemisphere. Two examples of this phenomenon are Ixodes scapularis and Amblyomma americanum, which have expanded their ranges in the USA in recent decades and are responsible for the continuous emergence of Lyme disease and human ehrlichiosis, respectively. This phenomenon is also occurring worldwide and is reflected by the increasing number of tick-borne encephalitis and haemorrhagic fever cases in Europe and Asia. In this review, we provide a concise synopsis of the most medically important tick-borne pathogen worldwide, with a particular emphasis on emerging public health threats.

Keywords: Haemaphysalis longicornis; Ixodes; Lyme disease; arboviruses; tick-borne diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Geographical distribution of selected tick-borne pathogens and diseases. All geographical boundaries are generalized and approximate. Abbreviations and descriptions are shown in Table 1. For some pathogens (Heartland virus, Thogoto virus, B. divergens, Ca. N. mikurensis), only country or state-level data were available. Only partial ranges are shown for some worldwide diseases and conditions – TBRF (tick-borne relapsing fever) in northwestern Africa, tick paralysis in Australia. Modified from previously published records and maps [29, 37, 44, 51, 53, 64, 66, 72, 83, 94, 105, 149–155]

References

    1. Rosenberg R, Lindsey NP, Fischer M, Gregory CJ, Hinckley AF, et al. Vital Signs : Trends in Reported Vectorborne Disease Cases — United States and Territories, 2004–2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67:496–501. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nelson CA, Saha S, Kugeler KJ, Delorey MJ, Shankar MB, et al. Incidence of Clinician-Diagnosed Lyme disease, United States, 2005-2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:1625–1631. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hinckley AF, Connally NP, Meek JI, Johnson BJ, Kemperman MM, et al. Lyme disease testing by large commercial laboratories in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:676–681. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Egizi A, Fefferman NH, Jordan RA. Relative risk for ehrlichiosis and Lyme disease in an area where vectors for both are sympatric, new Jersey, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:1080–6059. - PubMed
    1. Eisen RJ, Kugeler KJ, Eisen L, Beard CB, Paddock CD. Tick-Borne zoonoses in the United States: persistent and emerging threats to human health. ILARJ. 2017;58:319–335. - PMC - PubMed