Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Jun 2;172(11 Suppl):S123-S129.
doi: 10.7326/M19-0876.

Using Electronic Health Record Portals to Improve Patient Engagement: Research Priorities and Best Practices

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Using Electronic Health Record Portals to Improve Patient Engagement: Research Priorities and Best Practices

Courtney R Lyles et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Ninety percent of health care systems now offer patient portals to access electronic health records (EHRs) in the United States, but only 15% to 30% of patients use these platforms. Using PubMed, the authors identified 53 studies published from September 2013 to June 2019 that informed best practices and priorities for future research on patient engagement with EHR data through patient portals, These studies mostly involved outpatient settings and fell into 3 major categories: interventions to increase use of patient portals, usability testing of portal interfaces, and documentation of patient and clinician barriers to portal use. Interventions that used one-on-one patient training were associated with the highest portal use. Patients with limited health or digital literacy faced challenges to portal use. Clinicians reported a lack of workflows to support patient use of portals in routine practice. These studies suggest that achieving higher rates of patient engagement through EHR portals will require paying more attention to the needs of diverse patients and systematically measuring usability as well as scope of content. Future work should incorporate implementation science approaches and directly address the key role of clinicians and staff in promoting portal use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Dr. Nelson reports stock from QDM outside the submitted work. Authors not named here have disclosed no conflicts of interest. Disclosures can also be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M19-0876.

Figures

Appendix Figure 1.
Appendix Figure 1.
Study flow diagram.

References

    1. Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, et al. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006. Mar-Apr;13:121–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mandel JC, Kreda DA, Mandl KD, et al. SMART on FHIR: a standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23:899–908. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocv189 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Delbanco T, Walker J, Darer JD, et al. Open notes: doctors and patients signing on. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:121–5. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-153-2-201007200-00008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. U.S. Government Accountability Office. Health information technology: HHS should assess the effectiveness of its efforts to enhance patient access to and use of electronic health information. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office; March 2017. Accessed at www.gao.gov/products/GAO-17-305?utm_source=blog&utm_medium=social&utm_ca... on 28 September 2019.
    1. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:501–4. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1006114 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms