Neural correlates of self-evaluation in relation to age and pubertal development in early adolescent girls
- PMID: 32479376
- PMCID: PMC7260676
- DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100799
Neural correlates of self-evaluation in relation to age and pubertal development in early adolescent girls
Abstract
Early adolescence is marked by puberty, and is also a time of flux in self-perception. However, there is limited research on the neural correlates of self-evaluation in relation to pubertal development. The current study examined relationships between neural activation during self-evaluation of social traits and maturation (age and pubertal development) in a community sample of female adolescents. Participants (N = 143; age M = 11.65, range = 10.0-13.0) completed a functional MRI task in which they judged the self-descriptiveness of adjectives for prosocial, antisocial and social status-related traits. Pubertal development was based on self-report, and was also examined using morning salivary testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone, and estradiol. Contrary to preregistered hypotheses, neither age nor pubertal development were related to neural activation during self-evaluation. We further examined whether activation in two regions-of-interest, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and perigenual anterior cingulate (pgACC), was associated with trial-level self-evaluative behavior. In line with preregistered hypotheses, higher vmPFC and pgACC activation during self-evaluation were both associated with a higher probability of endorsing negative adjectives, and a lower probability of endorsing positive adjectives. Future studies should examine neural trajectories of self-evaluation longitudinally, and investigate the predictive value of the neural correlates of self-evaluation for adolescent mental health.
Keywords: Activation; Adolescence; Hormones; Puberty; Self-concept; fMRI.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures



References
-
- Barendse M.E.A., Vijayakumar N., Byrne M., Flannery J., Cheng T., Flournoy J., Nelson B., Cosme D., Mobasser A., Chavez S., Hval L., Brady B., Nadel H., Helzer A., Shirtcliff E.A., Allen N., Pfeifer J.H. Study protocol: transitions in adolescent girls (TAG) Front. Psychiatry. 2020;10 doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.01018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B., Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 2015;67(1):1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01. - DOI
-
- Brett M., Anton J.-L., Valabregue R., Poline J.-B. Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox. 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain; Sendai, Japan; 2002.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical