Clinical data for intravenous iron - debunking the hype around hypersensitivity
- PMID: 32479668
- PMCID: PMC7384172
- DOI: 10.1111/trf.15837
Clinical data for intravenous iron - debunking the hype around hypersensitivity
Erratum in
-
Correction to "Clinical data for intravenous iron - debunking the hype around hypersensitivity".Transfusion. 2024 Sep;64(9):1804-1805. doi: 10.1111/trf.17977. Epub 2024 Aug 8. Transfusion. 2024. PMID: 39118417 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Reluctance to use intravenous (IV) iron for the treatment of iron deficiency continues due to a perceived high risk of severe hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). Additionally, it has been hypothesized that 'dextran-derived' IV iron products (e.g., ferumoxytol [FER] and ferric derisomaltose/iron isomaltoside 1000 [FDI]) have a higher risk of severe HSRs than 'non-dextran-derived' products (e.g., ferric carboxymaltose [FCM] and iron sucrose [IS]). In the present analysis, HSR data from head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with IV iron products were evaluated to determine if differences in safety signals are present among these IV iron formulations.
Study design and methods: Reported serious or moderate-to-severe HSR incidence data from five RCTs (FIRM; FERWON-NEPHRO/-IDA; PHOSPHARE-IDA04/-IDA05) were used to calculate risk differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for FER, FCM, FDI, and IS. The rates and risk differences for these HSRs were compared.
Results: The analysis included data for 5247 patients: FER (n = 997), FCM (n = 1117), FDI (n = 2133) and IS (n = 1000). Overall rates of serious or moderate to severe HSRs were low (0.2%-1.7%). The risk differences (95% CIs) showed small differences between the IV iron formulations: FER versus FCM, -0.1 (-0.8 to 0.6); FDI versus IS, 0.1 (-0.3 to 0.5); FDI versus FCM, -0.9 (-3.7 to 1.9).
Conclusion: RCT evidence confirms a low risk of serious or moderate to severe HSRs with newer IV iron formulations and no significant differences among existing commercially available products. Thus, RCT data show that the supposed classification of dextran-derived versus non-dextran-derived IV iron products has no clinical relevance.
© 2020 The Authors. Transfusion published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AABB.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Intravenous iron for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in China: a patient-level simulation model and cost-utility analysis comparing ferric derisomaltose with iron sucrose.J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):561-570. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2065092. J Med Econ. 2022. PMID: 35403540
-
A Cost-Utility Analysis of Ferric Derisomaltose Versus Ferric Carboxymaltose in Patients with Iron Deficiency Anemia in China.Adv Ther. 2024 Nov;41(11):4191-4204. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02987-7. Epub 2024 Sep 18. Adv Ther. 2024. PMID: 39292421 Free PMC article.
-
Indirect methods of comparison of the safety of ferric derisomaltose, iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia.Expert Rev Hematol. 2020 Feb;13(2):187-195. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2020.1709437. Epub 2020 Jan 11. Expert Rev Hematol. 2020. PMID: 31928094 Review.
-
Comparison of hypersensitivity reactions of intravenous iron: iron isomaltoside-1000 (Monofer® ) versus ferric carboxy-maltose (Ferinject® ). A single center, cohort study.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Feb;85(2):385-392. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13805. Epub 2018 Dec 11. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019. PMID: 30393904 Free PMC article.
-
Newer formulations of intravenous iron: a review of their chemistry and key safety aspects - hypersensitivity, hypophosphatemia, and cardiovascular safety.Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2021 Jul;20(7):757-769. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1912010. Epub 2021 May 15. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2021. PMID: 33993818 Review.
Cited by
-
Authors' Reply to Michael Auerbach's Comment on: "Frequency and Associated Costs of Anaphylaxis- and Hypersensitivity-Related Adverse Events for Intravenous Iron Products in the USA: An Analysis Using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System".Drug Saf. 2021 May;44(5):611-613. doi: 10.1007/s40264-021-01059-x. Epub 2021 Apr 9. Drug Saf. 2021. PMID: 33835350 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Iron Treatment in Patients with Iron Deficiency Before and After Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Narrative Review.Nutrients. 2024 Oct 2;16(19):3350. doi: 10.3390/nu16193350. Nutrients. 2024. PMID: 39408317 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lessons learned from immunological characterization of nanomaterials at the Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory.Front Immunol. 2022 Oct 10;13:984252. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.984252. eCollection 2022. Front Immunol. 2022. PMID: 36304452 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding and Managing Infusion Reactions and Hypophosphataemia With Intravenous Iron-A Nurses' Consensus Paper.Nurs Open. 2025 Apr;12(4):e70191. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70191. Nurs Open. 2025. PMID: 40140601 Free PMC article.
-
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)-Associated Hypophosphatemia (HPP): A Systematic Review.Am J Hematol. 2025 May;100(5):840-846. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27598. Epub 2025 Feb 11. Am J Hematol. 2025. PMID: 39935027 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mueller MM, Van Remoortel H, Meybohm P, et al. ICC PBM Frankfurt 2018 Group. Patient blood management: recommendations from the 2018 Frankfurt Consensus Conference. JAMA 2019;321:983‐97. - PubMed
-
- Jahn MR, Andreasen HB, Fütterer S, et al. A comparative study of the physicochemical properties of iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer), a new intravenous iron preparation and its clinical implications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2011;78:480‐91. - PubMed
-
- Macdougall IC, Vernon K. Complement activation‐related pseudo‐allergy: a fresh look at hypersensitivity reactions to intravenous iron. Am J Nephrol 2017;45:60‐2. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical