Response to Zalta and Held's "Commentary on the Special Issue on Moral Injury: Leveraging Existing Constructs to Test the Heuristic Model of Moral Injury"
- PMID: 32479672
- DOI: 10.1002/jts.22514
Response to Zalta and Held's "Commentary on the Special Issue on Moral Injury: Leveraging Existing Constructs to Test the Heuristic Model of Moral Injury"
Abstract
Zalta and Held (2020) generated some interesting and potentially useful principles to distinguish moral distress and moral injury, leveraging ideas from our introduction to the Journal of Traumatic Stress special issue on moral injury. In this response, I provide feedback and commentary about the principles generated by Zalta and Held. I also attempt to modify and expand the various principles to accommodate any moral emotion and all possible dimensions of response to exposure to potentially morally injurious experiences.
© 2020 International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies.
Comment on
-
Commentary on the Special Issue on Moral Injury: Leveraging Existing Constructs to Test the Heuristic Model of Moral Injury.J Trauma Stress. 2020 Aug;33(4):598-599. doi: 10.1002/jts.22516. Epub 2020 Jun 29. J Trauma Stress. 2020. PMID: 32598507 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Litz, B. T., & Kerig, P. K. (2019). Introduction to the special issue on moral injury: Conceptual challenges, methodological issues, and clinical applications. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 32, 341-349. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22405
-
- Litz, B. T., Stein, N., Delaney, E., Lebowitz, L., Nash, W. P., Silva, C., & Maguen, S. (2009). Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: A preliminary model and intervention strategy. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 695-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.07.003
-
- Zalta, A., & Held, P. (2020). Commentary on the special issue on moral injury: Leveraging existing constructs to test the heuristic model of moral injury. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 33, 598-599.