Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 1;11(13):2009-2018.
doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00313. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

Ruthenium-Mediated 18F-Fluorination and Preclinical Evaluation of a New CB1 Receptor Imaging Agent [18F]FPATPP

Affiliations

Ruthenium-Mediated 18F-Fluorination and Preclinical Evaluation of a New CB1 Receptor Imaging Agent [18F]FPATPP

Salla Lahdenpohja et al. ACS Chem Neurosci. .

Abstract

Cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) controls various physiological and pathological conditions, including memory, motivation, and inflammation, and is thus an interesting target for positron emission tomography (PET). Herein, we report a ruthenium-mediated radiolabeling synthesis and preclinical evaluation of a new CB1R specific radiotracer, [18F]FPATPP. [18F]FPATPP was produced with 16.7 ± 5.7% decay-corrected radiochemical yield and >95 GBq/μmol molar activity. The tracer showed high stability, low defluorination, and high specific binding to CB1Rs in mouse brain.

Keywords: CB1R; FPATPP; Positron emission tomography; cannabinoid receptor; fluorine-18; radiofluorination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Chemical structures of [11C]1, [18F]2, [18F]3, and [18F]4.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the Reference Standard 4
Reagents and conditions: (a) acetic acid, (b) concentrated HCl and acetic acid, (c) (R)-(+)-1-phenylethylamine and CH2Cl2, and (d) NaBH3CN and acetic acid.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Synthesis of [18F]4. (B) Results from the process optimization. SPE + temperature denotes the solid-phase extraction with subsequent reaction temperature. Azeotropic + temperature denotes the traditional drying procedure of [18F]fluoride with subsequent reaction temperature. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD, n = 3).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Representative coronal and transaxial [18F]4 PET/CT images summed for 90–120 min in an adult mouse brain with vehicle (left) and 2 mg/kg rimonabant pretreatment (right). (B–D) Time–activity curves for the whole brain, neocortex, and hippocampus at baseline (n = 3, 1 female) and with rimonabant pretreatment (n = 3, 1 female) and their percentage difference at 120 min. Bl., Blocking; SUV, standardized uptake value. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Representative ex vivo brain autoradiography images of [18F]4 binding 120 min post injection in a nontreated mouse and a mouse pretreated with rimonabant to block the [18F]4 binding. (B) Ratios of the parietotemporal cortex (Ptc), striatum (Str), frontal cortex (Fc), hippocampus (Hippo), cortex, cerebellar gray matter (CB), and globus pallidus (Gp, n = 3, 1 female) to the thalamus (Tha) without blocking (n = 8, 1 female) and with blocking (Bl. n = 3, 1 female). ***P < 0.001, statistical analyses were performed with the Mann–Whitney U test.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Ex vivo biodistribution of (A) [18F]4 (30 min n = 4, 60 min n = 2, 120 min n = 8, 1 female) and (B) [18F]FMPEP-d2 (30 min n = 3, 60 min n = 4, 120 min n = 12, 5 females). Data are presented as injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g) and expressed as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, statistical analyses were performed with the Mann–Whitney U test.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Amount of the [18F]4 of the total 18F-radioactivity in plasma and cortex. The radiometabolites were analyzed at 30 min (n = 4), 60 min (n = 2), and 120 min (n = 5) post injection. A double exponential decay equation has been used for the fitting of the curves.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Howlett A. C.; Barth F.; Bonner T. I.; Cabral G.; Casellas P.; Devane W. A.; Felder C. C.; Herkenham M.; Mackie K.; Martin B. R.; Mechoulam R.; Pertwee R. G. (2002) International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of Cannabinoid Receptors. Pharmacol Rev. 54 (2), 161–202. 10.1124/pr.54.2.161. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mechoulam R.; Parker L. A. (2013) The Endocannabinoid System and the Brain. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64, 21–47. 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143739. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Herkenham M.; Lynn A. B.; Little M. D.; Johnson M. R.; Melvin L. S.; de Costa B. R.; Rice K. C. (1990) Cannabinoid Receptor Localization in Brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87 (5), 1932–1936. 10.1073/pnas.87.5.1932. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glass M.; Dragunow M.; Faull R. L. (1997) Cannabinoid Receptors in the Human Brain: A Detailed Anatomical and Quantitative Autoradiographic Study in the Fetal, Neonatal and Adult Human Brain. Neuroscience 77 (2), 299–318. 10.1016/S0306-4522(96)00428-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jordan C. J.; Xi Z.-X. (2019) Progress in Brain Cannabinoid CB2 Receptor Research: From Genes to Behavior. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 98, 208–220. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.026. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types