Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 1;15(6):e0233367.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233367. eCollection 2020.

NIH funding trends to US medical schools from 2009 to 2018

Affiliations

NIH funding trends to US medical schools from 2009 to 2018

Paige Noble et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Total NIH funding dollars have increased from 2009-2018. We questioned whether this growth has occurred proportionately around the country and throughout allopathic medical schools. Therefore, we compared the trend in NIH grant funding from 2009 to 2018 for United States allopathic medical schools among historically top-funded schools, private and public schools, and by region of the country. Changes in both unadjusted and real funding dollars over time revealed a significant difference. Region was the only significant factor for mean percent change in funding from 2009-2018, with the Western region showing a 33.79% increase in purchasing power. The Northeastern region showed a -6.64% decrease in purchasing power while the Central and Southern regions reported changes of 2.46% and -6.08%, respectively. The mean percent increases were more proportional and nonsignificant in the public vs. private institutions comparison, at -3.41% and 4.75%, respectively. Likewise, the top-funded institutions vs. other institutions comparisons demonstrated modest, nonsignificant differences. However, although the relative changes might be proportional, the absolute increases evidence a pattern of growing cumulative advantage that favor the highest-funded institutions and private institutions. The potential consequences of this disproportionate increase include health science education, biomedical research, and patient access disparities in large parts of the country. The NIH and the scientific community should explore potential solutions in its funding models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bindman A. Use of Public University Health System Revenues Presents Complex Choices. Journal of the American Medical Association Forum. June 28, 2018. https://newsatjama.jama.com/2018/06/28/jama-forum-use-of-public-universi...
    1. American Association of Medical Colleges. AAMC Medical School Members. Accessed July 31, 2019. https://members.aamc.org/eweb/DynamicPage.aspx?webcode=AAMCOrgSearchResu...
    1. United States Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Funding FY1994-FY2020. April 4, 2019. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R43341
    1. Katz Y, Matter UB. On the biomedical elite: Inequality and stasis in scientific knowledge production. DASH, 11 July 2017. https://cyber.harvard.edu/publications/2017/07/biomedicalelite. Accessed 16 January 2020.
    1. Wahls WP. Opinion: The National Institutes of Health needs to better balance funding distributions among US institutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(27):13150–13154. 10.1073/pnas.1909217116 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms