Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):98.
doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01137-7.

The considerations, experiences and support needs of family members making treatment decisions for patients admitted with major stroke: a qualitative study

Affiliations

The considerations, experiences and support needs of family members making treatment decisions for patients admitted with major stroke: a qualitative study

A Visvanathan et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. .

Abstract

Background: Treatment decision-making by family members on behalf of patients with major stroke can be challenging because of the shock of the diagnosis and lack of knowledge of the patient's treatment preferences. We aimed to understand how, and why, family members made certain treatment decisions, and explored their information and support needs.

Method: Semi-structured interviews with family members (n = 24) of patients with major stroke, within 2 weeks of hospital admission. Data were analysed thematically.

Results: Families' approach to treatment decision-making lay on a spectrum according to the patient's state of health pre-stroke (i.e. patient's prior experience of illness and functional status) and any views expressed about treatment preferences in the event of life-threatening illness. Support and information needs varied according to where they were on this spectrum. At one extreme, family members described deciding not to initiate life-extending treatments from the outset because of the patients' deteriorating health and preferences expressed pre-stroke. Information from doctors about poor prognosis was merely used to confirm this decision. In the middle of the spectrum were family members of patients who had been moderately independent pre-stroke. They described the initial shock of the diagnosis and how they had initially wanted all treatments to continue. However, once they overcame their shock, and had gathered relevant information, including information about poor prognosis from doctors, they decided that life-extending treatments were no longer appropriate. Many reported this process to be upsetting and expressed a need for psychological support. At the other end of the spectrum were family members of previously independent patients whose preferences pre-stroke had not been known. Family members described feeling extremely distressed at such an unexpected situation and wanting all treatments to continue. They described needing psychological support and hope that the patient would survive.

Conclusion: The knowledge that family members' treatment decision-making approaches lay on a spectrum depending on the patient's state of health and stated preferences pre-stroke may allow doctors to better prepare for discussions regarding the patient's prognosis. This may enable doctors to provide information and support that is tailored towards family members' needs.

Keywords: Decision-making; Experiences; Family members; Major stroke; Needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

FD is funded by the Stroke Association. WW is funded by the Chief Scientist Office. However, neither of these two co-authors was involved in data analysis, and their funding does not influence the presentation of data or interpretation of data in this manuscript. Other authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DWJ, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet (London, Engl) 2016;387(10029):1723–1731. - PubMed
    1. Dennis M, Lewis S, Cranswick G, Forbes J. FOOD: A multicentre randomized trial evaluating feeding policies in patients admitted to hospital with a recent stroke. Health Technol Assess (Rockv) 2006;10:1–91. - PubMed
    1. Dennis M, Sandercock P, Graham C, Forbes J. The Clots in Legs or sTockings after Stroke (CLOTS) 3 trial: A randomised controlled trial to determine whether or not intermittent pneumatic compression reduces the risk of post-stroke deep vein thrombosis and to estimate its cost-effectiveness. Health Technol Assess (Rockv). 2015;19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. General Medical Council. Treatment and care towards the end of life: good practice in decision making. Gen Med Counc. 2010;1–85. Available from: https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/treatment-and-care-towards-the-....
    1. Kon A, Davidson JE, Morrison W, Danis M, White DB. Shared decision making in intensive care units: an American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(1):188–201. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types