Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 2;10(1):8941.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65360-y.

Fine-tuning of Genome-Wide Polygenic Risk Scores and Prediction of Gestational Diabetes in South Asian Women

Affiliations

Fine-tuning of Genome-Wide Polygenic Risk Scores and Prediction of Gestational Diabetes in South Asian Women

Amel Lamri et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Gestational diabetes Mellitus (GDM) affects 1 in 7 births and is associated with numerous adverse health outcomes for both mother and child. GDM is suspected to share a large common genetic background with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The aim of our study was to characterize different GDM polygenic risk scores (PRSs) and test their association with GDM using data from the South Asian Birth Cohort (START). PRSs were derived for 832 South Asian women from START using the pruning and thresholding (P + T), LDpred, and GraBLD methods. Weights were derived from a multi-ethnic and a white Caucasian study of the DIAGRAM consortium. GDM status was defined using South Asian-specific glucose values in response to an oral glucose tolerance test. Association with GDM was tested using logistic regression. Results were replicated in South Asian women from the UK Biobank (UKB) study. The top ranking P + T, LDpred and GraBLD PRSs were all based on DIAGRAM's multi-ethnic study. The best PRS was highly associated with GDM in START (AUC = 0.62, OR = 1.60 [95% CI = 1.44-1.69]), and in South Asian women from UKB (AUC = 0.65, OR = 1.69 [95% CI = 1.28-2.24]). Our results highlight the importance of combining genome-wide genotypes and summary statistics from large multi-ethnic studies to optimize PRSs in South Asians.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
AUCs of the different P + T and LDpred PRSs based on Mahajan et al. and Scott et al. in South Asian women from START. Results from association tests with GDM, LD from 1000 Genomes. Abbreviations: AUC, Area under the curve; PRS, Polygenic risk score; P + T, Pruning and thresholding; SNP, Single nucleotide polymorphism; START, South Asian birth cohort; ROC, Receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 2
Figure 2
AUCs of the PRSs derived using LD from START and 1000 Genomes. Results are for Mahajan-based PRSs derived using SNPs tested in ≥85% of the study’s maximum Nsamples. Abbreviations: 1KG, 1000 Genomes; AUC, Area under the curve; PRS, Polygenic risk score; LD, Linkage disequilibrium; P + T, Pruning and thresholding; START, South Asian birth cohort; ROC, Receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 3
Figure 3
AUCs of P + T and LDpred PRSs in START. Results are for Mahajan-based PRSs derived using SNPs tested in ≥85% of the study’s maximum Nsamples and LD from 1000 Genomes. Abbreviations: AUC, Area under the curve; PRS, Polygenic risk score; LD, Linkage disequilibrium; P + T, Pruning and thresholding; START, South Asian birth cohort; ROC, Receiver operating characteristic.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Melchior, H., Kurch Bek, D. & Mund, M. The Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes: A Population-Based Analysis of a Nationwide Screening Program. Dtsch Aerzteblatt Int. (2017). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farrar D, et al. Hyperglycaemia and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016;354:i4694. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4694. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 8th edn. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation. (2017).
    1. Farrar D, et al. Association between hyperglycaemia and adverse perinatal outcomes in south Asian and white British women: analysis of data from the Born in Bradford cohort. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3:795–804. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00255-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anand SS, et al. What accounts for ethnic differences in newborn skinfold thickness comparing South Asians and White Caucasians? Findings from the START and FAMILY Birth Cohorts. Int. J. Obes. (Lond) 2016;40:239–244. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2015.171. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms