Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;30(4):295-303.
doi: 10.1111/tme.12690. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

Molecular characterisation of RhD variants in North Indian blood donor population

Affiliations

Molecular characterisation of RhD variants in North Indian blood donor population

Dheeraj Khetan et al. Transfus Med. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: A molecular analysis of serologically RhD variant samples was conducted to find the incidence of various D variants in our blood donor population.

Background: Determining a blood donor's RhD phenotype and genotype is important as transfusion of units with a weak D or partial D phenotype can result in immunisation of the recipients.

Methods: Samples with discrepant D and weak D phenotypes identified on testing with at least five different monoclonal anti-D antisera were considered serological RhD variant and subjected to molecular testing (Massarray kit, Agena Bioscience, San Diego) for variant RHD gene.

Results: A total of 39 samples, including 19 RhD discrepant samples and 20 weak D samples, were identified as serological RhD variant from a total of 4386 samples. Thirteen (13/39) samples carried variants leading to weak D phenotype, and eight samples had variants leading to partial D categories. Seven samples (7) could not be characterised, whereas 11 samples were identified as Rh negative (RHD*01N.01) after molecular testing. Overall incidence of D variants in the study population was 0.48%. RHD*weak D type 1(5, 0.1%) and RHD*DFR1 (5, 1%) were the most common variants identified.

Conclusions: Few samples with weak reaction on serological testing were found to be partial D variant and vice versa. Donor centres should develop a protocol for genotyping of samples with aberrant results on serological testing for assessing the actual RhD status of an individual as results of serological testing may be misleading.

Keywords: D variants; MALDI-TOF; RHD gene; RHD genotyping; mass array; prevalence; weak D.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Muller TH, Wagner FF, Trockenbacher A, et al. PCR screening for common weak D types shows different distributions in three central European populations. Transfusion. 2001;41:45-52.
    1. Daniels G. Variants of RhD-current testing and clinical consequences. Br J Haematol. 2013;161:461-470.
    1. Sandler SG, Flegel WA, Westhoff CM, et al. It's time to phase in RHD genotyping for patients with a serologic weak D phenotype. Transfusion. 2015;55:680-689.
    1. Carritt B, Kemp TJ, Poulter M. Evolution of the human RH (rhesus) blood group genes: a 50 year old prediction (partially) fulfilled. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6:843-850.
    1. Wagner FF, Flegel WA. Review: the molecular basis of the Rh blood group phenotypes. Immunohematology. 2004;20:23-36.

LinkOut - more resources