Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Oct;22(10):1799-1807.
doi: 10.1111/dom.14100. Epub 2020 Jun 28.

Ultra rapid lispro improves postprandial glucose control compared with lispro in patients with type 1 diabetes: Results from the 26-week PRONTO-T1D study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Ultra rapid lispro improves postprandial glucose control compared with lispro in patients with type 1 diabetes: Results from the 26-week PRONTO-T1D study

Leslie Klaff et al. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultra rapid lispro (URLi) versus lispro in adults with type 1 diabetes in a 26-week, treat-to-target, phase 3 trial.

Materials and methods: After an 8-week lead-in to optimize basal insulin glargine or degludec, patients were randomized to double-blind mealtime URLi (n = 451) or lispro (n = 442), or open-label post-meal URLi (n = 329). The primary endpoint was change from baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) to 26 weeks (non-inferiority margin 0.4%), with multiplicity-adjusted objectives for postprandial glucose (PPG) excursions after a meal test.

Results: Both mealtime and post-meal URLi demonstrated non-inferiority to lispro for HbA1c: estimated treatment difference (ETD) for mealtime URLi -0.08% [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.16, 0.00] and for post-meal URLi +0.13% (95% CI 0.04, 0.22), with a significantly higher endpoint HbA1c for post-meal URLi versus lispro (P = 0.003). Mealtime URLi was superior to lispro in reducing 1- and 2-hour PPG excursions during the meal test: ETD -1.55 mmol/L (95% CI -1.96, -1.14) at 1 hour and - 1.73 mmol/L (95% CI -2.28, -1.18) at 2 hours (both P < 0.001). The rate and incidence of severe, documented and postprandial hypoglycaemia (<3.0 mmol/L) was similar between treatments, but mealtime URLi demonstrated a 37% lower rate in the period >4 hours after meals (P = 0.013). Injection site reactions were reported by 2.9% of patients on mealtime URLi, 2.4% on post-meal URLi, and 0.2% on lispro. Overall, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between treatments.

Conclusions: The results showed that URLi provided good glycaemic control, with non-inferiority to lispro confirmed for both mealtime and post-meal URLi, while superior PPG control was demonstrated with mealtime dosing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

L.K. received research grants from Abbott, Ascensia Diabetes Care, Cnoga Medical, Eli Lilly and Company, Gan & Lee, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, REMD Biotherapeutics, Sanofi, Senseonics, Xeris and Zealand Pharma. D.C., M.A.D., J.T. and J.M.B‐V. are employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company. J.M. received speaker fees from Abbott, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Böhringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Johnson & Johnson, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, MSD, Mylan, Taisho Pharma, Tanabe‐Mitsubishi, Terumo and Sanofi, and consultant fees from Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Kanro, Kowa, and Terumo. D.D. received research grants or speaker fees from Astra Zeneca, Böhringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Lexicon Pharma, Mylan, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Zealand Pharma. J.L reports no conflicts of interest. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from study entry to week 26. Data are mean at study entry and least squares mean ± SE at all other time points and based on the mixed‐effects model for repeated measures analysis. *P <0.05 for pairwise comparison of post‐meal ultra rapid lispro (URLi) versus lispro; ^ P <0.05 for pairwise comparison of post‐meal URLi versus mealtime URLi. Estimated treatment difference (ETD) between URLi and lispro (URLi−lispro) was −0.8 mmol/mol (−0.08%) with a two‐sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of −1.7 to 0.0 mmol/mol (−0.16 to 0.00%) for mealtime URLi, and +1.4 mmol/mol (+ 0.13%) with 95% CI 0.5 to 2.4 mmol/mol (0.04 to 0.22%) for post‐meal URLi, demonstrating non‐inferiority of both mealtime and post‐meal URLi to lispro in the change from baseline to week 26 in HbA1c
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Postprandial glucose (PPG) excursions during a meal test at week 26. Data are least squares mean ± SE. *P <0.05 for pairwise comparison of ultra rapid lispro (URLi) versus lispro; **P <0.001 for pairwise comparison of URLi versus lispro. Prandial insulin dose for the mixed‐meal tolerance test (MMTT) was individualized for each patient based on their prandial insulin dosing plan. For patients using carbohydrate counting, the morning meal insulin‐to‐carbohydrate ratio was used to calculate the prandial insulin dose for the MMTT. For patients not using carbohydrate counting, the prandial insulin dose for MMTT was calculated based on the average total daily insulin dose for the 3 days prior to the MMTT. CI, confidence interval; ETD, estimated treatment difference (mealtime URLi−lispro)
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Ten‐point self‐monitored blood glucose profile at week 26. Data are least squares mean ± SE. *P <0.05 for pairwise comparison of mealtime URLi versus lispro; ^ P <0.05 for pairwise comparison of post‐meal URLi versus lispro; #P <0.05 for pairwise comparison of post‐meal URLi versus mealtime URLi
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Rate and incidence of hypoglycaemia (with or without symptoms) from randomization to week 26 [blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL)]. A, Rate and incidence of documented and nocturnal hypoglycaemia. B, Rate and incidence of post‐meal hypoglycaemia. Data are least squares mean (LSM) + SE for event rate and LSM for incidence. Note: Nocturnal hypoglycaemia was defined as documented hypoglycaemia occurring between bedtime and waking

References

    1. Nathan DM. The diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study at 30 years: overview. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(1):9‐16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, et al. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(25):2643‐2653. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sherwani SI, Khan HA, Ekhzaimy A, Masood A, Sakharkar MK. Significance of HbA1c test in diagnosis and prognosis of diabetic patients. Biomark Insights. 2016;11:95‐104. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonora E, Tuomilehto J. The pros and cons of diagnosing diabetes with A1C. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(Suppl 2):S184‐S190. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ceriello A. Postprandial hyperglycemia and diabetes complications: is it time to treat? Diabetes. 2005;54(1):1‐7. - PubMed

Publication types