Effectiveness of a self-regulation intervention for weight loss: A randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 32489005
- DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12436
Effectiveness of a self-regulation intervention for weight loss: A randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate effectiveness and acceptability of a novel intervention, based on self-regulation theory, for weight loss.
Design: A two-arm parallel group design was employed.
Methods: Adult participants with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and the aim to lose weight were recruited and randomized to either a control or intervention group. Both groups were asked to weigh themselves daily for eight weeks. The intervention group was encouraged to use a weight tracking app, and complete daily and weekly questionnaires to prompt action planning, reflection, and evaluation of actions. Participants chose daily actions from a menu of 53 behaviours. The primary outcome was weight change after 8 weeks, assessed using linear mixed effects models. At follow-up, 20 intervention group participants were interviewed regarding their experiences in the trial.
Results: 100 participants were recruited, and 98% were followed up at 8 weeks. Mean weight loss was -4.18 kg (SD = 3.84) in the intervention compared to -1.01 kg (SD = 2.67) in the control group; the adjusted difference was -3.20 kg (95% CI -4.49, -1.92). Participants rated the intervention's usefulness as 8.25 (SD = 2.04) on a scale from 1 to 10. Adherence was a significant independent predictor of weight loss success (-1.54 kg per one SD, 95% CI -2.16, -0.93), but not a mediator of the intervention effect. Participants reported that the intervention enabled them to experiment with and identify effective weight loss actions.
Conclusions: Guiding participants through the self-regulation process was feasible, acceptable to participants, and led to significantly greater short-term weight loss than unguided self-weighing.
Keywords: randomized controlled trial; self-regulation; weight loss.
© 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.
References
-
- Acharya, S. D., Elci, O. U., Sereika, S. M., Music, E., Styn, M. A., Turk, M. W., & Burke, L. E. (2009). Adherence to a behavioral weight loss treatment program enhances weight loss and improvements in biomarkers. Patient Preference and Adherence, 3, 151-160. https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s5802
-
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
-
- Bennett, G. G., Steinberg, D., Askew, S., Levine, E., Foley, P., Batch, B. C., … Miranda, H. (2018). Effectiveness of an app and provider counseling for obesity treatment in primary care. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55, 777-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.005
-
- Benyamini, Y., Geron, R., Steinberg, D. M., Medini, N., Valinsky, L., & Endevelt, R. (2013). A structured intentions and action-planning intervention improves weight loss outcomes in a group weight loss program. American Journal of Health Promotion, 28(2), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.120727-QUAN-365
-
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57-71). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical